Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DeltaQuadBot 5
[[User:DeltaQuadBot|DeltaQuadBot 5]]
{{Newbot|DeltaQuadBot|5}}
Operator: {{User|DeltaQuad}}
Time filed: 19:24, Sunday March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Not Public.
Function overview: Report names just as the UAA Module for SoxBot did.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Every 5 or 10 minutes.
Estimated number of pages affected: 1
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): N
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function details: Checks usernames on API, if they match the criteria, report them.
=Discussion=
- {{tlp|BAG assistance needed}} Flagging this right away as the trial needs to start ASAP to get this thing starting to report some names as this was requested a while ago. -- DQ (t) (e) 19:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Please note the following different from SoxBot:
:*The Wait until edits is not yet programmed in, instead a message is outputed
:*All entries that do not directly match the Blacklist are subject to the similar charecters search
:*All entries are read as regex, but in a safe way (as in could be anything around it)
:*
:Thanks. -- DQ (t) (e) 19:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
:*Where does it report doubtful names?
:*Does the wording of the report include what you have sensibly said here, that regex can be wrong?
:*Why wait until they edit?
:*Does it do anything else than report?Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
::Well as SoxBot had it:
::#Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
::#The regex is only a way to try and check, quite a few entries were already regex flaged, but the operation should still be the same as if regex wasn't run (please also understand I am bridging between PHP and Python here). It's like walking your dog around the block one way or the other way.
::#Why wait until they edit, because that is how admins have asked for it. And also it just makes sense to see if a username is editing promotionally before you report/block them. (See the username policy for more info).
::#Uhh...in this task? No. As a bot, yes, I have other already approved tasks. Please see User:DeltaQuadBot for more information on what is already happening with the bot.
::For more informtaion on the old SoxBot UAA task, please see the userpage, the the BRFA, and [https://svn.toolserver.org/svnroot/soxred93/NameWatcher/ the old code]. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
{{bottrial|days=7}} Good for a test. - Kingpin13 (talk) 02:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
:I released the bot this morning to edit unsupervised on TS. Few minor template errors, but other than that it's running as it should/was asked to. DQ.alt (t) (e) 16:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
::This is lovely. I started a non-IRC version because it kept crashing...edited on linux and now it's gone. Will be rebuilding that for now and compensating for the wait till edit. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
:::Still in the debugging state at this point. It was blocked for errors today. I will be looking into the exact cause for this. There was extended downtime last week due to toolserver issues. DQ.alt (t) (e) 16:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- {{BotTrialComplete}} I'm done debugging [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AUsernames_for_administrator_attention%2FBot&action=historysubmit&diff=425012821&oldid=425012404except one minor issue] and a ready to go block button on the history so it's friendlier for watchlists. And I think I have overstayed my welcome on the trial. I will let it keep editing though. -- DQ (t) (e) 20:44, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- :I'm currently reviewing this, first thing to note is that the bot should remove blocked users from User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Wait - I doubt they're gonna be editing any time soon ;), so checking for edits from them is a waste of resources. - Kingpin13 (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
{{BotApproved}} I have spoken to DeltaQuad about this, just to record on-wiki: The bot will now remove blocked users and will also not in the report if the bot waited for the user to edit. - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.