Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FACBot 6

FACBot 6

[[User:FACBot|FACBot 6]]

{{Newbot|FACBot|6}}

Operator: {{botop|Hawkeye7}}

Time filed: 01:51, Tuesday, February 11, 2020 (UTC)

Function overview: Go through all the Featured Articles, and merge certain templates in the {{tl|Article History}} template.

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised

Programming language(s): C#

Source code available: TBA

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates#Most supports ever garnered in a FAC? see also Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/GimmeBot 2 from 2007.

Edit period(s): A series of runs, doing more articles each time.

Estimated number of pages affected: There are 5,674 featured articles, but most should not require a change. FACBot has been performing this for featured articles upon promotion since 2014, but an error was found, under which not all peer review templates were merged.

Namespace(s): Talk

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Go through the talk pages of featured articles and merge the {{tl|DYK}}, {{tl|featured article}}, {{tl|peerreview}}, {{tl|oldpeerreview}} and {{tl|GA}} templates into the {{tl|Article History}} template. If the article does not have an {{tl|Article History}} template, then create one (but all FAs should already have one).

=Discussion=

{{BotTrial|edits=50}} Seems reasonable. Primefac (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

:Trial conducted with 50 edits. Pages updated are list here. All looks good. Some improvements were made to error handling. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

::{{re|Hawkeye7}} please remember to mark as {{tl|BotTrialComplete}} when done, or we won't know that it isn't still in trial ;) --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

----

{{BotApproved}} Looks good to me. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.