Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RoboMaxCyberSem 3

[[User:RoboMaxCyberSem|RoboMaxCyberSem]], task 3

{{Newbot|RoboMaxCyberSem|3}}

Operator: MaxSem(Han shot first!)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB with CFD plugin

Function Summary: Recategorisation

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): daily

Edit rate requested: ~6 epm

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Moving :Category:Wikipedia essays that are in userspace, into :Category:User essays, as requested at Wikipedia:BOTREQ#Recategorize, and Working on backlog at Wikipedia:CFD/W and Wikipedia:CFD/WU. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 11:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

= Discussion =

I was actually planning on doing the essay changes as I posted on the bot requests page, do you want me to do it to save you a task? — E talkBAG 11:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

:Feel free to do it if you already have the approval. In that case this request will be only about Wikipedia:CFD/W. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 12:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

{{BotTrial|edits=100}} As you know, the edit summary should contain the CFD log. -- maelgwn - talk 10:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

:I shall be doing the essays task, as I have offered to take control of it to MaxSem to save some stress. See Wikipedia:BRFA#EBot_III. — E talkBAG 12:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

::Any update on the trial? — E talkBAG 17:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

:::I had no time for it, will make a run soon. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 14:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

::::Trial complete. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 21:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Please give this bot a different name. Dlae|here 15:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

::Because... ? MaxSem(Han shot first!) 21:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

:::{{BotApproved}} The edits seem excellently done and I do not personally see a problem with the username. Discussions regarding this may be taken elsewhere. — E talkBAG 23:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.