Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SmackBot XI

Operator: Rich

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): AWB

Function Summary: To date undated mantenance templates in the category

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Dailyish

Edit rate requested: 6 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Picks up all monthly sorted maint templates, and all the synonyms I could find. Also pickes up substed tags.

Rich Farmbrough, 22:34 17 November 2006 (GMT).

What are the maintanence templates this deals with? Please list those on the bot's page. This seems simple enough though.Voice-of-All 19:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

:Those that put things in subcategories of :Category:Wikipedia maintenance categories sorted by month - currently

:*{{:tl:wikify}}

:*{{:tl:orphan}}

:*{{:tl:uncat}}

:*{{:tl:uncatstub}}

:*{{:tl:cleanup}} and their synonyms.

:Rich Farmbrough, 22:39 20 November 2006 (GMT).

Seems good to me. Could a BAGer give this the nod for a trial, or indeed a full run? It's been listed here for over a week. Alai 13:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

20px Approved for trial. Perform up to 50 - 100 edits and post the results here within 1 week. Make sure the test includes examples for the various categories listed above. -- RM 18:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

:Testing: See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=50&offset=20061117224537&target=Rich_Farmbrough here] ''

:Will add an exhaustive test page later. Rich Farmbrough, 18:09 27 November 2006 (GMT).

{{BotApproved}} I don't need to see more. Had you provided diffs when this request was made I would have been inclined to speedily approve this. I swear another bot is already doing this exact same type of thing, but in any case, everything looks great. I noticed that in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Whitehead%27s_point-free_geometry&diff=prev&oldid=88511381 this edit] that the bot also did some HTML correction. -- RM 18:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

:Thank you. Rich Farmbrough, 20:24 27 November 2006 (GMT).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.