Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TAP Bot 6

TAP Bot 6

[[User:TAP Bot|TAP Bot 6]]

{{Newbot|TAP Bot|6}}

Operator: {{botop|Thine Antique Pen}}

Time filed: 20:50, Sunday, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: www.recmusic.org/lieder has migrated to www.lieder.net/lieder without redirects

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): BOTREQ

Edit period(s): one time

Estimated number of pages affected: 624

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): yes

Function details: www.recmusic.org/lieder has migrated to www.lieder.net/lieder without leaving redirects. I have checked a large sample of the 624 potential edits and the latter elements of the URL remain. Bot will replace the old, broken links with new, working links.

=Discussion=

{{BotTrial|edits=50}} — Earwig talk 20:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

  • {{BotTrialComplete}} - 52 edits made as I accidentally forgot to remove two discussion pages regarding the broken links. Otherwise, no problems. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Spot-checks pass, but I notice one odd thing. The replacements do not always lead to the same page as before the rename. For example, take http://www.recmusic.org/lieder/g/gavrilin.html. It was originally [https://web.archive.org/web/20110610174249/http://www.recmusic.org/lieder/g/gavrilin.html an alphabetic listing], but the new URL [http://www.lieder.net/lieder/g/gavrilin.html has links to multiple listing types]. The suggested redirect is [http://www.lieder.net/lieder/get_settings.html?ComposerId=9270 the new alphabetic listing page]. I don't have strong opinions either way, since both work, but I think it makes more sense to follow the suggested redirect from recmusic.org as long as it is not to the root page, as with http://www.recmusic.org/lieder/get_settings.html?ComposerId=2520. — Earwig talk 21:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • For the Gavrilin link I'd prefer
  • :http://www.lieder.net/lieder/g/gavrilin.html
  • :i.e. the mere substitution from the original link (http://www.recmusic.org/lieder/g/gavrilin.html) – not the suggested link at the "soft redirect" page (http://www.recmusic.org/lieder/get_settings.html?ComposerId=2520) as that last page doesn't offer a link to the "catalog order" view of this composer's output. Tx anyway! --Francis Schonken (talk) 04:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
  • :*Okay, we can stick with that then. {{BotApproved}} — Earwig talk 15:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.