Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Yobot 13

{{Newbot|Yobot|13}}

Operator: Magioladitis

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, supervised

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: It's AWB auto-tagger. Code is available

Function overview:

• Auto-tagging of uncategorized articles found in [http://toolserver.org/~jason/uncategorized_articles.php toolserver]. Tagging/untagging will include all AWB's taggers.

• NEWSFLASH! Generalised function after discussion: Auto-tagging by request running in selected lists. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Per request in Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Tagging_of_uncategorized_articles. It turns out that various bot have been doing similar tasks in the past but discontinued. Per Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Yobot 11, Yobot is already using auto-tagger in other categories without any problem.

Edit period(s): Often

Estimated number of pages affected: ~13,000 articles in first run.

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details:

AWB's auto-tagger will be activated. Pages will be loaded from toolserver. Auto-tagger includes various tags like: {{tl|orphan}}, {{tl|wikify}}, {{tl|stub}}, {{tl|ibid}}, etc. Orphan tagging will be restricted to linkless pages according to nowadays demands.

General fixes is a question. I can run it with genfixes off. A recent discussion concluded that we can activate genfixes if we make certain restrictions. I am ok both ways (genfixes can be limited only if tagging is performed). I have reorganised AWB's bug page so that we have an overview of all the known bugs for bth auto-tagger and genfixes.

-- Magioladitis (talk) 23:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

:I made a list a few months ago of articles that use Ibid as a reference. See [http://toolserver.org/~tim1357/Static/Articles%20using%20Ibid.2.27.10.txt here]. Tim1357 (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

::Nice. I hope that in the future AWB will be able to fix some of these cases automatically. I can use AWB to tag these article if you want. I noticed some of them are not tagged with Ibid. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

{{BotTrial|edits=50}} Feel free to run with limited genfixes enabled. — The Earwig ^(talk) 19:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

::{{BotTrialComplete}} (25 April 2010 22:19-22:29). Everything went as expected. I limited the genfixes by not doing Manual of style fixes and I had "Skip if not Auto-tagging" turned on. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

• I could extend this bot run to article lacking Ibid based on the list given above, if they are no disagreements. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:54, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
• I could make a bot to help this situation too. I updated the function request to generalise it. did 50 extra test edits (from 22:00, 2 May 2010 to 22:05, 2 May 2010) -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

{{tl|BAGAssistanceNeeded}} I think we can close this as "approved". -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

:Please provide a link to edits performed in the trial. Josh Parris 09:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

::First run (main task to add uncategorised): [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1922_National_Intercollegiate_Basketball_Tournament&diff=prev&oldid=358288599], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1954_Cadillac_Eldorado&diff=prev&oldid=358288609], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1_Service_Battalion&diff=prev&oldid=358288648], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2005_in_ARCA_Remax_Series&diff=prev&oldid=358288677], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010_National_Games_of_India&diff=prev&oldid=358288727], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2010_Worcester_Royals_Season&diff=prev&oldid=358288742], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=41st_New_York_Volunteer_Infantry_Regiment&diff=prev&oldid=358288765], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ACEC_California&diff=prev&oldid=358288809], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Walk_Down_Abbey_Road&diff=prev&oldid=358288828], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Al-Hamd_Educational_Society&diff=prev&oldid=358289560], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amod_%28SugandhPur%29&diff=prev&oldid=358289670], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ampere_model_of_magnetization&diff=prev&oldid=358289682], for more check the timestamps I gave above.

::Second run (main task to deal with expand tag): [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Ballance&diff=prev&oldid=359715374], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acacia_Elementary_School&diff=prev&oldid=359718290], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Action_of_22_June_1803&diff=prev&oldid=359718302], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coler-Goldwater_Specialty_Hospital&diff=prev&oldid=359718356], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Expo_86_%28album%29&diff=prev&oldid=359718409], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jayanti_Stadium&diff=prev&oldid=359718482], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lake_Center_Christian_School&diff=prev&oldid=359718508], for more check the timestamps I gave above.

::Maybe [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Love_Finds_Andy_Hardy&diff=prev&oldid=359718540] should be replaced with expand-section instead of being removed? -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

:::I had a second thought in the last one: I think we have to stick to the rule "if stub remove expand". -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

::::Regarding that particular edit, it removed an expand template from a section, leaving the section without text. In this particular case it appears that the {{tl|expand}} has been used when {{tl|expand section}} or even {{tl|empty section}} ought to have been. Correct as you see fit. Josh Parris 14:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

{{BotApproved}} Josh Parris 14:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.