Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 April 30#Category:... Pokémon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 13:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Category for a hockey team that never skated...See Cincinnati Mighty Ducks for background. ccwaters 23:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Any articles about this can go in :category:Cincinnati Mighty Ducks, its former name.--Mike Selinker 06:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 13:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

The broader classification will allow for a greater range of styles to be represented. Dan, the CowMan 22:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Rename per nom. David Kernow 16:07, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Rename -- Christian radio is a relatively contemporary genre, anyway.--Marysunshine 22:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 13:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Change to match other CVG categories. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 22:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Move per my nomination. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 22:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rename per nom. David Kernow 01:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge with :Category:Kurdistan. 4 Merge votes, 6 delete votes, 1 keep. Merge chosen because in terms of creation and deletion of categories (i.e. actual admin intervention) there is no difference. The only practical difference is the items currently in Kurdish provinces will be in Kurdistan category. Anyone may remove any articles from that category afterwards if they disagree with them being there. Tim! 16:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

wikipedia is not a soapbox or a battleground. Hattusili 20:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Also it is not right to call the cities in turkey where people from variable ethnicities live as Kurdish cities.--Hattusili 20:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

If I get it right, the entire process of tagging various localities®ions under :Category: Kurdish provinces and :Category: Kurdish cities had been initiated by a possible sockpuppet. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser#Retau] --Cretanforever 08:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

• Merge to :Category:Kurdistan. Clearly some or all of the provinces do fall into the remit of that somewhat nebulous cat which recently survived a delete vote IIRC. Some of these provinces are already listed in Category:Kurdistan. Listing provinces from four different countries in the same cat is misleading as provinces will be defined differently in each country. Valiantis 22:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The only option possible is an article with a list, in the same vein as List of U.S. cities with Hispanic majority populations, which can then be discussed in the frame of that article/list. Otherwise it would pave the way for loose and wild categories such as :Category:Hispanic cities. Delete :Category:Kurdish cities as well! --Cretanforever 16:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I don´t seem any wrong with the Categeory:Kurdish cities and Category:Kurdish provinces. You can´t take the Us-hispanic as an exemple and compare it with the Kurdish one, that´s crazy. OtrO DiAOtrO DiA 00:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• :Why not? Hispanics are an ethnic minority too. Whats so special about Kurds that makes them "better" from Hispanics? --Cat out 11:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Delete per my nomination.Delete :Category:Kurdish cities as well! --Hattusili 11:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Valiantis. "Kurdish provinces" doesn't have a clear meaning (presumably it means administrative provinces in a range of countries that are in some broad sense identifiable as Kurdish in culture, language, or politics?) but this is the sort of thing that is better listified and well-referenced. Cretanforever is very close to the mark with "Hispanic cities" - there may be no mainstream Hispanic-independence movement but it is still a near exact analogy (whether or not there is a Fooian independence movement shouldn't change whether "Fooian cities/province etc" is a meaningful category), so I don't see what's crazy about it. A better analogy would be "Tutsi villages" which can be found in many countries in Africa; again, that would be better listified since it would be then possible to see exactly why the village is being described that way (e.g. by % of population, or historical links) and what the sources behind the claim are. The same would apply here - it would be possible make a "List of provinces that have been described as Kurdish" or "List of province with a Kurdish majority population" or "List of historically Kurdish provinces" and make them well-referenced and NPOV. I'm not convinced that the same can be done with this category. I would be happy to get rid of the Kurdish cities category too, but it needs to be nominated before anyone can vote on it! TheGrappler 00:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• :The category is used to mark provinces of todays Turkey, Iraq, Iran etc. So "historic" isnt the case. Also we have no census data establishing how many kurds are, let alone establish where they have a "majority population". Exactly who determines which city is kurdish and which one isnt? Also, we do not tag provinces based on ethnicity anywhere. --Cat out 11:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• : I nominated :Category: Kurdish cities for deletion as well. Also, see remark on top --Cretanforever 08:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Valiantis. Lapaz 02:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment – Please join the discussion of Kurdish categorization at Category talk:Kurdistan (and Talk:Batman, Turkey) --Moby 09:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

:*I think the right place for discussion is here. --Cretanforever 08:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

::* Well there are already on-going discussions about the whole issue, including the possibility of sub cats. This discussion is about a specific CFD. (speaking of which, could you please finish the process you started [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AKurdish_cities&diff=51803863&oldid=51656842 here]) --Moby 09:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

:::*Yes and the person creating this and similar templates and categories is not honoring the discussion. --Cat out 20:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

• Merge with :Category:Kurdistan or revise sub cat scheme. --Moby 09:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As per Cretanforever. Also, can someone explain me what the point of this category is? The category has provinces from 3 different countries which implies that all three provinces belong to some sort of common political body. If so I'd like that to be cited but last time I checked Kurds in Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Syria etc have not broken off from their respective countries. Furthermore nowhere else do we mark provinces based on ethnicity. We do not mark Texas as a red state either. I also believe :Category:Kurdish cities is highly unnecesary and perhaps should be deleted as well. --Cat out 10:59, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per norm -- - K a s h ^{Talk | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Emailuser/Kashk email]} 17:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I don't mind :Category:Kurdistan, but these two new ones are pushing it. —Khoikhoi 22:15, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Delete per nomination, there is already a :Category:Kurdistan. --ManiF 22:20, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Rename all - TexasAndroid 14:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

These set of categories has hardly got going, but it does have potential as there are Ancient Greek sites in 10+ modern countries. However, they need clearer names:

• :Category:Greek sites by country --> :category:Ancient Greek sites by country
• :Category:Greek sites in Albania --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Albania
• :Category:Greek sites in Lebanon --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Lebanon
• :Category:Greek sites in Turkey --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Turkey
• Rename all CalJW 20:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rename all Valiantis 22:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rename all --Cretanforever 16:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Rename all (For full disclosure, I have begun most -- maybe all -- of these categories); the change helps an awkwardness around "Greek sites in Greece" when that comes up (and it will):

also

• :Category:Greek sites in Iran --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Iran
• :Category:Greek sites in Iraq --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Iraq
• :Category:Greek sites in Israel --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Israel
• :Category:Greek sites in Jordan --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Jordan
• :Category:Greek sites in Central Asia --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Central Asia
• :Category:Greek sites in Syria --> :category:Ancient Greek sites in Syria

Carlossuarez46 18:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

• rename all Tagging now complete. Hawkestone 15:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Rename all and all further above. David Kernow 01:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Rename all above and below per nom.--ᎠᏢ462090^Contribs 03:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename Tim! 17:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Rename The term Afro-Mexican is more commonly used to refer to Mexicans with African ancestry. Some find the term "Black Mexican" offensive. --- Lancini87 20:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Rename per nom. Hawkestone 18:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Rename per nom Mayumashu 14:14, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Tim! 17:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Not sure what this category is for, but it contains only one article from user space. Conscious 18:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC).

• Delete. Absolutely get rid of that, since it may confuse those looking for :Category:Pokémon.--Mike Selinker 19:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above, and a NAME vio. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete—yep, it's gotta go. —Doug Bell ^{talk•contrib} 10:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. —Ruud 22:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. David Kernow 01:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• I choose you, delete! :P --Cat out 11:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Tim! 17:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Completely redundant to :Category:High schools. Rory096 17:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC).

• Delete. This is used for a single entry pointing to user space. The included :Category:Bellaire High School Students & Alumni should also be deleted. Vegaswikian 19:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Pepsidrinka 20:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. David Kernow 01:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into :category:High schools Choalbaton 23:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• There is nothing to merge since there are no schools listed. Vegaswikian 19:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge - TexasAndroid 14:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Only three articles. Merge into the much larger category. Bhoeble 16:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC).

• Comment This further demonstrates the inadequacy of :Category:Anti-war activists as the three people in this group are Elizabeth Dilling, an American anti-semite opposed to US involvement in WW2, Ivan Supek, a Croatian physicist who campaigned against nuclear weapons (who apparently fought against the wartime Croatian fascist government), and Gordon Wilson who spoke out against both Republican and Loyalist violence in Northern Ireland, which the majority of people would not, I suspect, describe as a war. Valiantis 23:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename Tim! 16:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

There's been some movement in Mars cat names recently and this seems a sensible change as well. Mars nomenclature includes "valles" and "chasma(ta)". They naturally overlap and the category should include both. Marskell 15:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Rename but with a lower case c' Bhoeble 16:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rename. agreed, lower case 'c'. Mlm42 17:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Changed the letter. Marskell 19:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rename per nom. David Kernow 01:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Rename, per nom.--ᎠᏢ462090^Contribs 02:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was relisted on May 4 Tim! 16:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

An article incorrectly created as a category. A similar article exists with the correct title Bahamas Democratic Movement. Delete Valentinian ^(talk) 13:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Bhoeble 16:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. mattbr³⁰ 19:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. David Kernow 01:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This category was never tagged with CFD; relisted on May 4 under Category:Island Group Company, Inc.. — sjorford (talk) 08:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge Tim! 17:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

I mistakenly created :Category:Nature-related lists when I really meant to elevate :Category:Nature lists to be directly under :Category:Lists (partly because :Category:Nature isn't under anything but :Category:Fundamental). But since the list should be of the form x-related lists anyway, this might as well be a merge. JeffW 04:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Bhoeble 16:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per nom. mattbr³⁰ 19:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per nom. David Kernow 01:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per nom. Her Pegship 19:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Rename/Merge/Delete as nominated. - TexasAndroid 14:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

These categories don't follow Wikipedia's usual style, and I see no value in trying to decide which of them are "modern".

• :Category:Triumphal arches (American) rename :category:Triumphal arches in the United States
• :Category:Modern triumphal arches (France) rename :category:Triumphal arches in France
• :Category:Modern triumphal arches (Germany) rename :category:Triumphal arches in Germany
• :Category:Modern triumphal arches (London, UK) a separate London category is excessive and both items are in :category:Monuments and memorials in London. Merge into:category:Triumphal arches in the United Kingdom
• :Category:Modern triumphal arches in Paris, France again this is excessive. Merge into :Category:Triumphal arches in France when the above has been renamed. Each item has two other Parisian categories.
• :Category:Triumphal arches (modern, European and Russian) redundant intermediate step and somewhat POV as well. All the subcategories are in :category:Triumphal arches and the national "Monuments and memorials" category. Delete
• :Category:Triumphal arch (modern, European) Duplicate of the previous item. Empty. Delete
• :Category:Triumphal arches (modern, the West) Yet another unneeded intermediate step. One of the subcategories is suggested for deletion and the other is also in :Category:Triumphal arches. Delete
• :Category:Triumphal arches (modern) Yet another redundant tier. All subcategories dealt with above. Delete
• :Category:Roman triumphal arches rename :Category:Ancient Roman triumphal arches because that is what it is for.
• :Category:Triumphal arches in Rome rename :category:Ancient Roman triumphal arches in Rome
• :Category:Roman triumphal arches (Italy) rename :category:Ancient Roman triumphal arches in Italy
• :Category:Triumphal arches (Roman provincial) merge into :category:Ancient Roman triumphal arches (when the above has been renamed) because the others are "provincial" by default and this category adds nothing but a tinge of POV (please don't complain that I am being anachronistic there, this is the 2006 edition of Wikipedia).

I done a lot of category work, but I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this muddle before! CalJW 04:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Support all Bhoeble 17:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Support all Chicheley 18:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Support all as per nom. mattbr³⁰ 19:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Support all Valiantis 23:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Support all and hand towel to CalJW. (Not to throw but to wipe brow!) David Kernow 01:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Support all — Eoghanacht ^talk 13:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Support all--ᎠᏢ462090^Contribs 01:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete - TexasAndroid 14:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Typo. See :category:Visitor attractions in Belgium Delete. CalJW 03:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC).

• Delete....but I say that with a slightly heavy heart - only because I think I really like the idea of "attactions" as a word. :) ExRat 21:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

:: Attaction, n. v.

::: 1. n. (as elision of "at action") First used to describe the state of active editors on Wikipedia (q.v.); now used generally as a synonym for "active", "in action", etc.

::: 2. n. v. The state of being attracted to something as if tacked to it; often used with overtones of being addicted (e.g. "I'm still attacted to Wikipedia" or "He never overcame his Wikipedia attaction").

:: Etymologically, David Kernow 13:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

• delete definitely a typo. Tim! 13:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. mattbr³⁰ 19:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Bucketsofg✐ 00:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.