Login
Login

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 7#

width = "100%"
width="50%" align="left" | < February 6

! width="50%" align="right" | February 8 >

= February 7 =

== Category:Splendor Solis ==

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 08:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Splendor Solis}}

:Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT already in :Category:Alchemical documents so no need to upmerge Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Support Can't think of a potential 2nd article here, let alone a 5th. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

==Category:Islamist insurgents==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 April 8%23Category:Islamist insurgents

== Category:Professional wrestling rosters ==

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 March 19#Category:Professional_wrestling_rosters. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

----

:* Propose renaming :Category:Professional wrestling rosters to :Category:Professional wrestling personnel

:Nominator's rationale: Changing name of category to match the pages within in. All were recently made consistent and category should match. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 22:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

== Category:Anti-pornography movements ==

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 March 11#Category:Anti-pornography_movements. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)4

----

:* Propose renaming :Category:Anti-pornography movements to :Category:Anti-pornography movement

:Nominator's rationale: This was suggested on the Speedy page, but it did not fit the criteria there. I am inclined to agree with the original nominator that there is an overall anti-pornography movement. – Fayenatic London 17:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

{{collapse top|Copy of discussion on Speedy page}}

{{collapse bottom}}

  • Inclined to keep plural (if there's one movement, why are there so many articles, I ask myself). It seems unlikely to me, given the geographic and time ranges, that half these groups have even heard of the other half. Mary Whitehouse's lot (older British readers will recall it), now rebranded Mediawatch-UK, is not there, nor are a number of older groups, now presumably defunct. Nor is the US National Legion of Decency. As always, people should spend less time worrying about the minutiae of category names, and more about whether they contain the obvious basic contents! You know who you are. Johnbod (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

::Bear in mind, there is a fundamental distinction between movements and organizations. Movements are comprised of organizations along with large numbers of individuals. This is true across the board, regardless of what particular movement you're talking about. In this case, all of those organizations are part of the Anti-pornography movement. Anomalous+0 (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Johnbod}} - I should have pinged you when I posted my reply to your comment. Anomalous+0 (talk) 10:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep. It's not a single movement. For one, anti-porn feminism and anti-porn evangelicalism are quite different. feminist (talk) 15:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Tend to support. The article Anti-pornography movement in the United Kingdom (singular) suggests it is one movement originated from two different perspectives (a feminist and a conservative/religious perspective). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

== Scandinavian royalty ==

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 March 11#Scandinavian_royalty. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

----

:* Propose merging :Category:Royal houses of Norway to :Category:Norwegian royal houses

:* Propose renaming :Category:Royal houses of Denmark to :Category:Danish royal houses

:* Propose renaming :Category:Royal families of Sweden to :Category:Swedish royal houses

:* Propose renaming :Category:Burial sites of Royal families of Sweden to :Category:Burial sites of Swedish royal houses

:Nominator's rationale: more consistent with :Category:Scandinavian royal houses, siblings in :Category:Burial sites of European royal families, and the contents of these categories which use "House" rather than "family" or "dynasty". – Fayenatic London 13:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

{{collapse top|Copy of discussion on Speedy page}}

{{collapse bottom}}

  • Oppose - more people will find these categories more quickly if their names begin with "Royal families of ...". --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak support, only for consistency reasons. The form "Royal houses of Norway" is actually more to the point than "Norwegian royal houses" which may imply "Royal houses from Norway", so a wider nomination with a reverse rename would be appreciated. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

== Category:Fictional characters with energy manipulation powers ==

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: Option A. Timrollpickering (Talk) 21:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Fictional characters with energy manipulation powers

:** Option A: to :Category:Fictional characters with energy-manipulation abilities

:** Option B: to :Category:Fictional characters who can manipulate energy

:Nominator's rationale: procedural nomination following inconclusive discussion on Speedy page. – Fayenatic London 13:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

{{collapse top|Copy of discussion on Speedy page}}

{{collapse bottom}}

  • Interestingly, this category and all of its siblings have been deleted in 2007 per this CfD and recreated later. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Option A A hyphen is needed here, since "energy manipulation" serves as an adjective to "abilities". Dimadick (talk) 13:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

== Category:Arthurian games ==

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering (Talk) 21:12, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Arthurian games to :Category:Games based on Arthurian legend

:* Propose renaming :Category:Cultural depictions of Arthurian legends to :Category:Cultural depictions of Arthurian legend

:* Propose renaming :Category:Works based on Arthurian legends to :Category:Works based on Arthurian legend

:* Propose renaming :Category:Television series based on Arthurian legends to :Category:Television series based on Arthurian legend

:Nominator's rationale: The first one will be clearer, despite the majority of siblings being named "Arthurian [media]"; the contents are not games played at Arthur's court. The proposed names are consistent with :Category:Arthurian legend, :Category:Minor planets named from Arthurian legend and :Category:Locations associated with Arthurian legend. The first one was rejected on the Speedy page, see below. – Fayenatic London 10:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

{{collapse top|Copy of discussion on Speedy page}}

{{collapse bottom}}

  • Support per nom. Johnbod (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

== Category:Right-Wing Militia ==

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:CFD 2019 March 11#Category:Right-Wing_Militia. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

----

:* Propose renaming :Category:Right-Wing Militia to :Category:Right-wing militia organizations in the United States

:Nominator's rationale: Procedural nomination following suggestion at Speedy page, matching article Militia organizations in the United States. – Fayenatic London 10:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

{{collapse top|Copy of discussion on Speedy page}}

{{collapse bottom}}

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

== Category:Caucus ==

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: relisted at WP:CFD 2019 March 11. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

----

:* Propose renaming :Category:Caucus to :Category:United States presidential caucuses

:Nominator's rationale: The current name is excessively vague; the category contains articles about caucuses used in selecting US presidential candidates. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Comment I'm wondering if your proposal would work better as a sub-category under :Category:Caucus since a minority of the current won't belong in the new category. Specifically, Boston Caucus isn't presidential, Caucus and Caucus chair are not American-specific. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:06, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Rename to {{cl|United States caucuses}} - firstly it's distinctly about the US, and not about caucases in other parts of the world, and secondly, it should use the plural. If you want an overall parent, then it should be {{cl|Caucuses}}, but I dpn't see it as being particularly vital. Grutness...wha? 10:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Rename to {{cl|United States caucuses}} (or similar) per Grutness. Johnbod (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Rename to :Category:Caucuses in the United States. Better grammatically. Anomalous+0 (talk) 12:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

:::Or that. Johnbod (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.