Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 26

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Language preservation organisations}}

:Nominator's rationale: Only one category in here, which isn't helpful for navigation. The only category is a language advocacy organization. Mason (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Keep. This simply needs to be populated. It is [https://www.google.com/search?q=language+preservation+organization+OR+organisation+OR+society+OR+association obviously] not the case that this can sensibly only have one entry in it. I just didn't personally do the work to find more for it.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  23:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• :It's not helpful for navigation. The criteria you're alluding to, that it has potential for growth, isn't a reason to keep a category. Mason (talk) 03:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The child is already in :Category:Language advocacy organizations. Not useful for navigation. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
• Delete, overlaps with :Category:Language advocacy organizations. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Art museums and galleries by year}}

:Nominator's rationale: Redundant layer. Both sub-categories are already properly categorized in the above tree(s) so no merging is needed. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Support per nom Mason (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Former Continental Indoor Football League teams to :Category:Continental Indoor Football League teams

:Nominator's rationale: The league is defunct so there "former" part is irrelevant. User:Namiba 19:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Support per nom. Let'srun (talk) 23:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Fictional Mexican people by city to :Category:Fictional Mexican people and :Category:Fictional people by populated place

:Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Fictional characters from Tianjin}}

:Nominator's rationale: delete for now, only one article in the category. There is no need to merge because the article is already in the tree of :Category:Fictional Chinese people in literature. No objection to recreate the category when some more articles are available. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Support per nom Mason (talk) 03:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Polynesian sculptors}}

:Nominator's rationale: Empty category (technically it contains itself but that doesn't count because it shouldn't contain itself) DannyS712 (talk) 14:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delete; although it could be put in :Category:Polynesian culture and over :Category:Sculptors from Hawaii and :Category:Samoan sculptors, there is not a "Polynesian arts/artists" hierarchy where it could usefully help with navigation. – Fayenatic London 14:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• :Support per nom and Fayenatic Mason (talk) 03:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. I am skeptical on the interest of Polynesian categories vs. Oceanian ones, unless an obvious exception is necessary. They usually end up in an uncontrolled mixture of ethnicity and geography. If this is about ethnicity, there should probably be an article about Polynesian sculpture, and :Category:Sculptors from Hawaii should probably not be in it as ethnic Polynesian Native Hawaiians are a minority in Hawaii. If it is about geography, it should be called Oceanian sculptors. Place Clichy (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Jahangir Butt}}

:Nominator's rationale: WP:EPONYMOUS category with a single image, Jahangir Butt could be added but the category would still be too small to be useful DannyS712 (talk) 14:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• :Support per nom Mason (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Years of the 20th century in the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic to :Category:Years in the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic

:Nominator's rationale: Following precedents e.g. :Category:Years in the Soviet Union. – Fayenatic London 14:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• I think the member categories should also be renamed & redirected using "Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic" rather than "Uzbekistan", and likewise the decades within :Category:Decades in the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic, and :Category:Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic. These would then follow siblings in :Category:Years in the Soviet Union for Kazakh, Moldavian and Turkmen SSRs.

:Perhaps some others within :Category:Republics of the Soviet Union such as "in Russia" and "in Azerbaijan" are not anachronistic in the same way, and therefore the chronology subcats of e.g. :Category:Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic and :Category:History of Ukraine (1918–1991) can be left with their short names. Discuss? – Fayenatic London 14:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Personally I agree with renaming the subcategories too, but I have noted that this is controversial with establishments (see e.g. recent discussion about pre-18th-century establishments in the United Kingdom). Marcocapelle (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging {{clc|Category:Culture of Sindh}} to :Category:Sindhi culture

:Nominator's rationale: Overlapping categories. Mason (talk) 13:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge or reverse merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:People from the Soviet Union by republic to :Category:Soviet people by republic

:Nominator's rationale: Per other categories in {{Cl|Soviet people}}, borderline WP:C2C. Place Clichy (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Rename per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Rename per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Anarchists from Austria-Hungary}}

:Nominator's rationale: Ok, now the merger has been carried out, I want to bring up deletion. I don't think this category of "Anarchists from Austria-Hungary" is a remotely defining characteristic for any of its entries, nor do I think it can be one. To go through the list: Luisa Landová-Štychová and Michael Kácha were Czech anarchists, involved in specifically Czech organisations both before and after the collapse of Austria-Hungary; Josef Peukert was from the German-speaking area of Bohemia and left Austria-Hungary to work in Germany at a young age, going on to spend the rest of his life in Britain and the United States; Hippolyte Havel probably comes the closest to having "anarchist from Austria-Hungary" as a defining characteristic, but even he spent most of his life and activist career in the United States, which he's far more known for than his origins.

To conclude, I don't think being an "anarchist from Austria-Hungary" is a remotely defining enough characteristic to constitute its own category. Each of its entries are already better categorised into different categories, whether "Czech anarchists", "Austrian anarchists" or "American anarchists". Unless I'm missing some pan-Austro-Hungarian anarchist movement that existed across national lines, I don't see any reason why this category shouldn't be deleted. Grnrchst (talk) 11:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Oppose per comments below. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Comment Particularly on the question of the first two people mentioned, I guess this comes down to the fundamental question about whether categories with titles like "Czech anarchists" are defined by nationality or ethnicity. (I assume) Landová-Štychová and Kácha were ethnically Czech, but were never Czech citizens as the country didn't exist as an independent entity until the 1990s. Personally I would err on the side of defining membership of such categories as being based on nationality due to the potential for endless disputes about ethnicity (which means Landová-Štychová and Kácha should be categorised as Anarchists from Austria-Hungary and Anarchists from Czechoslovakia). Therefore leaning oppose, but this probably needs a much bigger discussion. Number 57 11:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• Leaning towards opposition. I don't think it is appropriate to push forward ethnicity rather than nationality, especially for anarchists. I added a few other members, including Ervin Szabó for instance. Place Clichy (talk) 14:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose, while people may be categorized by ethnicity, that doesn't exclude them from categorizing by nationality. I am ok with moving people from Austro-Hungarian nationality to American nationality if the US is the country where they mainly were active as an anarchist. But that does not fundamentally change the need for :Category:Anarchists from Austria-Hungary to exist. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 18:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:1503 mergers and acquisitions to :Category:16th-century mergers and acquisitions and :Category:1503 disestablishments

:* Propose merging :Category:1592 mergers and acquisitions to :Category:16th-century mergers and acquisitions and :Category:1592 disestablishments

:* Propose merging :Category:1598 mergers and acquisitions to :Category:16th-century mergers and acquisitions and :Category:1598 disestablishments

:* Propose merging :Category:1600 mergers and acquisitions to :Category:16th-century mergers and acquisitions and :Category:1600 disestablishments and :Category:1600 in economics

:* Propose merging :Category:1615 mergers and acquisitions to :Category:1615 disestablishments and :Category:1615 in economics and :Category:Companies disestablished in the 17th century

:* Propose merging :Category:1789 mergers and acquisitions to :Category:1789 disestablishments and :Category:1789 in economics and :Category:Companies disestablished in the 1780s

:Nominator's rationale: merge, isolated categories with only 1 or 2 articles each, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge all per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• :Support per nom Mason (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Archery national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Archery logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Amateur boxing national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Boxing logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Canoeing national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Canoeing logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Cycling national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Cycling logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Diving national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Diving logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Equestrian national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Equestrian logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Fencing national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Fencing logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Golf governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Golf logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Golf national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Golf logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Gymnastics national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Gymnastics logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Modern pentathlon national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Modern pentathlon logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Pickleball governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Shooting sports national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Shooting sports logos

:* Propose merging :Category:Surfing national governing bodies logos to :Category:Sports governing body logos and :Category:Surfing logos

:Nominator's rationale: merge for now, only 1-3 logos in each of these categories which is not helpful for navigation. No objection to recreate any of these categories when some more logos are available. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Support per nom Mason (talk) 13:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge all per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: split. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose splitting :Category:Roman roads in Turkey to :Category:Roman roads in Asia and :Category:Roman roads in Europe

:Nominator's rationale: split, Turkey did not exist yet and it is odd to combine Roman roads in the Balkan with Roman roads in Asia Minor in one category just because Istanbul is nowadays part of Turkey. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Support per nom Mason (talk) 13:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Support but add to each "Roman sites in Turkey" Hugo999 (talk) 22:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::* It is not clear from the articles that there are any archaeological sites involved. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: keep. WP:SNOW keep, withdrawn by nominator due to concerns being addressed. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose splitting :Category:Female child soldiers to :Category:Child soldiers and :Category:Female soldiers

:* Propose splitting :Category:Fictional female child soldiers to :Category:Fictional child soldiers and :Category:Fictional female soldiers

:Nominator's rationale: Would appear to violate WP:OCEGRS. Either parent category is defining but gender does not appear to be relevant in this intersection, nor is it necessary to split an overlarge category. If it is relevant, it would need evidence that it would support its own separate article. (In this case "split" means dual merge). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Oppose. This intersection is indeed defining, these two categories are not something totally unnecessary such as "Category:Male adult soldiers". As for whether there could be an article on this subject, [https://www.google.com/search?q=female+child+soldiers&sca_esv=658a7a69cf297c41&source=hp&ei=VzazZYfHJLOdwbkP8P6nGA&oq=female+child+sold&gs_lp=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_CAgoQABgWGB4YDxgK&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp#ip=1 well you can take a look at a bunch of different potential sources]. AHI-3000 (talk) 04:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Leaning to support dual merge, I can't imagine that girl soldiers would be a notable stand-alone topic apart from child soldiers generally. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose. Intersection between gender and child soldiers is defining, as evident from the existence of a large body of literature specifically about female child soldiers, or with entire chapters dedicated specifically to female child soldiers, or which otherwise clearly treat female child soldiers as a defining intersectional category distinct from merely the overlap of child soldiers and female soldiers. ([https://www.jstor.org/stable/45054822 1], [https://books.google.nl/books?id=MtGuDwAAQBAJ 2], [https://books.google.nl/books?id=EOINo8zooJoC 3], [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137516565_3 4], [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13642980802396903 5], [https://books.google.nl/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dtZD6gDvJHcC&oi=fnd&pg=PA183&ots=24FuYOoINs&sig=QBfCpDkfe0Z_j3hZEEPd-MUUPdA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false 6], [https://books.google.nl/books?id=Ob7QAQAAQBAJ 7], [https://books.google.nl/books?id=dAOsDwAAQBAJ 8], [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0967010604049523 9], [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10402659.2012.704255 10], among many, many others). AddWittyNameHere 12:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• :* Ok, based on this I withdraw my earlier comment. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• :Lean merge. It seems like there's potential here, but I'd feel more comfortable if there was a stub/article covering some of this. Mason (talk) 13:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• :@Smasongarrison & @Zxcvbnm: an article now exists at Girl soldiers. AddWittyNameHere 13:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
• ::Understood, I will withdraw it as the basis for it existing has been proven. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 18:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Created suo jure peeresses to :Category:Suo jure peeresses

:Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category with no male equivalent Mason (talk) 03:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge, redundant category layer since the parent category is nearly empty. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Roman roads in Arabia and Parthia to :Category:Roman roads in Asia

:Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one page in here with is unhelpful for navigation Mason (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. If kept, shorten the title to just :Category:Roman roads in Arabia since the Parthian Empire was not part of the Roman Empire. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Deaths in Djibouti}}

:Nominator's rationale: Deaths in FOO categories are container categories. There are no categories to contain Mason (talk) 02:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging

::* :Category:Art museums and galleries established in 1506 to :Category:1506 in art, :Category:Museums established in the 16th century, :Category:Educational organizations established in the 1500s, and :Category:Art museums and galleries established in the 2nd millennium

::* :Category:Art museums and galleries established in 1543 to :Category:1543 in art, :Category:Museums established in the 16th century, :Category:Educational organizations established in the 1540s, and :Category:Art museums and galleries established in the 2nd millennium

::* :Category:Art museums and galleries established in 1618 to :Category:1618 in art, :Category:Museums established in the 17th century, :Category:Educational organizations established in the 1610s, and :Category:Art museums and galleries established in the 2nd millennium

::* :Category:Art museums and galleries established in 1661 to :Category:1661 in art, :Category:Museums established in the 17th century, :Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 1661, :Category:Educational organizations established in 1661, and :Category:Art museums and galleries established in the 2nd millennium

::* :Category:Art museums and galleries established in 1694 to :Category:1694 in art, :Category:Museums established in the 1690s, :Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 1694, :Category:Educational organizations established in 1694, and :Category:Art museums and galleries established in the 2nd millennium

:* Propose deleting

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in 1506}}

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in the 1500s}}

::* {{lc|Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 1506}}

::* {{lc|Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in the 1500s}}

::* {{lc|Category:Educational organizations established in 1506}}

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in 1543}}

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in the 1540s}}

::* {{lc|Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 1543}}

::* {{lc|Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in the 1540s}}

::* {{lc|Category:Educational organizations established in 1543}}

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in 1618}}

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in the 1610s}}

::* {{lc|Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 1618}}

::* {{lc|Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in the 1610s}}

::* {{lc|Category:Educational organizations established in 1618}}

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in 1661}}

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in the 1660s}}

::* {{lc|Category:Museums established in 1694}}

::* {{lc|Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 1694}}

:Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT. All contain just one entry. I plan on some subsequent nominations to this tree, but I did not want to overload a single nomination. This tree and its parent need some massive cleanup. Side note (uninvolved in this nomination): what is cultural infrastructure? There is not even a :Category:Cultural infrastructure. Seems like a very subjective intersection. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

• Merge/delete per nom. Regarding the sidenote, "cultural infrastructure" looks like a made up term. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
• :Not opposing the the nomination but Googling brings up many results for "cultural infrastructure". Not sure it's needed in category names though. MClay1 (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|UNAM Pumas American football seasons}}

:Nominator's rationale: Only 1 page in category. Let'srun (talk) 00:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

::Merge to Category:National Autonomous University of Mexico athletics, which is what UNAM is short for Mason (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.