Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 1#Battles by location in Italy

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Holden former executives to :Category:Holden executives

:* Propose merging :Category:General Motors former executives to :Category:General Motors executives

:Nominator's rationale: No need to distinguish between former and (implicitly) current GM executives Mason (talk) 22:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Scottish models by century}}

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century Scottish models to :Category:21st-century Scottish people

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Welsh models by century}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|English models by century}}

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century English models to :Category:21st-century English people

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century models from Northern Ireland to :Category:20th-century people from Northern Ireland

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century Australian models to :Category:20th-century Australian people

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Models from Northern Ireland by century}}

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century Irish models to :Category:20th-century Irish people

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century American models to :Category:20th-century American people

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century Australian models to :Category:21st-century Australian people

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Irish models by century}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|British models by century}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Australian models by century}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|American models by century}}

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century Canadian models to :Category:20th-century Canadian people

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Canadian models by century}}

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century Canadian models to :Category:21st-century Canadian people

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century models from Northern Ireland to :Category:21st-century people from Northern Ireland

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century Irish models to :Category:21st-century Irish people

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century American models to :Category:21st-century American people

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Models by century and nationality}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|21st-century models}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Models by nationality and century}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Models by century}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|20th-century models}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|20th-century models by nationality}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|21st-century models by nationality}}

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century British models to :Category:British models and :Category:21st-century British people

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century Scottish models to :Category:20th-century Scottish people and :Category:Scottish models

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century English models to :Category:English models and :Category:20th-century English people

:* Propose merging :Category:21st-century Welsh models to :Category:Welsh models and :Category:21st-century Welsh people

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century British models to :Category:20th-century British people and :Category:British models

:* Propose merging :Category:20th-century Welsh models to :Category:Welsh models and :Category:20th-century Welsh people

:Nominator's rationale: Models, like other modern occupations, aren't diffused by century.Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_March_7#Models_by_century. I urge the category creator to look at the deletion history/logs of a category before they create it. Mason (talk) 21:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Merge/delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
• Merge/delete per nom. NLeeuw (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge to :Category:Organizational structure of political parties. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Governing body of political parties}}

:Nominator's rationale: Redundant, incorrect on many counts. Nohe of the articles in the category is specifically about any "governing body". - Altenmann >talk 20:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Merge to parent :Category:Organizational structure of political parties where the subcategories properly belong. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Jews and Judaism in Sullivan County, New York to :Category:Religious buildings and structures in Sullivan County, New York

:Nominator's rationale: Merge; category had a few summer camps, some not Jewish-specific, which have been moved to the appropriate categories. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Merge, as there is only a Synagogues subcategory left. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 04:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Ezo'la to :Category:Ezóla

:Nominator's rationale: Category is tagged with {{tl|Correct title}} but there does not appear to exist any technical reason for it being at the current location. I still didn't go for WP:C2D to be safe. Nickps (talk) 17:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Rename There is no technical prohibition on diacritics in category names. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Nickps (talk) 17:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Humanities to :Category:Academic staff of Wuhan University

:* Propose deleting :Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Medical Sciences to :Category:Wuhan University

:* Propose merging :Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Social Sciences to :Category:Wuhan University

:Nominator's rationale: Upmerge because these single item categories doesn't help with navigation within this university. Further they don't even have eponymous pages. Mason (talk) 13:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Merge per nom, and :Category:Wuhan University School of Medicine alumni should be nominated for merging too. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Institute of Ukrainian Archaeography to :Category:Institute of Ukrainian Archaeography and Source Studies

:Nominator's rationale: I think that these are the same organization Mason (talk) 13:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Merge per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 04:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Ongoing conflicts in the Middle East to :Category:Conflicts in the Middle East

:Nominator's rationale: rename, there is no reason to limit this to ongoing conflicts, we do not have any other Ongoing conflicts category. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Rename per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Rename Likely to become outdated with passage of time. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 04:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Institutes of Nirma University of Science & Technology to :Category:Nirma University

:Nominator's rationale: I think we should rename this category to include the university. Main article is a redirect to Nirma University via Nirma University of Science & Technology Mason (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Rename There should be a topic category for the entire university. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge/rename as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 04:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Battles by location in Italy to :Category:Military history of Italy by region

:* Propose upmerging for now :Category:Battles in Abruzzo‎ (2 P) to :Category:History of Abruzzo

:* Propose renaming :Category:Battles in Apulia‎ (13 P) to :Category:Military history of Apulia‎

:* Propose upmerging for now :Category:Battles in Basilicata‎ (3 P) to :Category:History of Basilicata

:* Propose renaming :Category:Battles in Calabria‎ (9 P) to :Category:Military history of Calabria‎

:* Propose upmerging :Category:Battles in Campania‎ (29 P) to :Category:Military history of Campania

:* Propose upmerging :Category:Battles in Emilia-Romagna‎ (1 C, 51 P) to :Category:Military history of Emilia-Romagna

:* Propose renaming :Category:Battles in Friuli-Venezia Giulia‎ (1 C, 8 P) to :Category:Military history of Friuli-Venezia Giulia

:* Propose renaming :Category:Battles in Lazio‎ (1 C, 18 P) to :Category:Military history of Lazio

:* Propose renaming :Category:Battles in Liguria‎ (1 C, 12 P) to :Category:Military history of Liguria‎

:* Propose renaming :Category:Battles in Lombardy‎ (48 P) to :Category:Military history of Lombardy

:* Propose renaming :Category:Battles in Marche‎ (10 P) to :Category:Military history of Marche

:* Propose upmerging for now :Category:Battles in Molise‎ (2 P) to :Category:History of Molise

:* Propose upmerging :Category:Battles in Piedmont‎ (32 P) to :Category:Military history of Piedmont

:* Propose upmerging :Category:Battles in Sardinia‎ (5 P) to :Category:Military history of Sardinia

:* Propose upmerging :Category:Battles in Sicily‎ (1 C, 23 P) to :Category:Military history of Sicily

:* Propose upmerging for now :Category:Battles in Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol‎ (2 P) to :Category:History of Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol

:* Propose upmerging :Category:Battles in Tuscany‎ (19 P) to :Category:Military history of Tuscany

:* Propose upmerging for now :Category:Battles in Umbria‎ (3 P) to :Category:History of Umbria

:* Propose upmerging :Category:Battles in Veneto‎ (33 P) to :Category:Military history of Veneto‎

:Nominator's rationale: WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN. Follow-up to recent precedents, e.g. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 24#Battles by location in Germany. Upmerging those that already have dedicated Military history of Fooland cats, Renaming those that have at least 5 P to Military history of Fooland, Upmerging those that have fewer than 5 P to History of Fooland for now. NLeeuw (talk) 09:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Rename/merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:People with acquired American citizenship to :Category:Naturalized citizens of the United States

:* Propose merging :Category:People with acquired British citizenship to :Category:Naturalised citizens of the United Kingdom

:* Propose merging :Category:People with acquired French citizenship to :Category:Naturalized citizens of France

:* Propose merging :Category:People with acquired Indian citizenship to :Category:Naturalised citizens of India

:* Propose merging :Category:People with acquired Israeli citizenship to :Category:Naturalized citizens of Israel

:* Propose merging :Category:People with acquired Russian citizenship to :Category:Naturalised citizens of Russia

:Nominator's rationale: Merge; I don't see any difference between "Acquired citizenship" and "Naturalized citizen". Since I can't be sure, I will start this as a small Cfd before deciding on continuing with the rest. Also leave redirect. Omnis Scientia (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Note: "Naturalized citizens" categories are MUCH older than "Acquired citizenship" ones. Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• I am inclined to support this, as I can't tell the difference either, but I am open to counter arguments. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
• :@Smasongarrison, pinging you just for a second opinion on this. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
• ::Lean merge. I'm of the same mind as Marco. This seems reasonable to merge, and I can't think of any counter arguments. Mason (talk) 19:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete all. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 04:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

• :Category:Battles of the Middle Ages by location (2 C, 0 P)
• :Category:Battles in medieval Anatolia‎ (35 P)
• :Category:Battles in medieval Thrace‎ (5 P)
• Option 1: Just delete all. All battles are already in the relevant involving former country X categories. (most of these are Byzantine Empire and its successors, Arab caliphates, Bulgaria, Armenia, Seljuk sultanates and their successors). Neither Thrace nor Anatolia was or is a "country".
• Option 2: Upmerge to :Category:Battles of the Middle Ages; delete :Category:Battles of the Middle Ages by location. This seeks a common denominator to upmerge to, as the precedent does. But to me, it rather feels like "dumping" them into a rather unspecific category that isn't very helpful.
• Option 3: Rename to :Category:Military history of medieval Anatolia and :Category:Military history of medieval Thrace; add parent :Category:Military history of Turkey; delete :Category:Battles of the Middle Ages by location. This is somewhat in line with other recent precedents that upmerge or rename {{xt|Battles in Fooland}} to {{xt|Military history of (modern administrative unit)}}. But due to the Lorraine problem, these would not be proper new categories. "Turkey" is a proper modern administrative unit, but "medieval Thrace" and "medieval Anatolia" aren't; neither Thrace nor Anatolia was or is a "country", nor is there any {{xt|Category:Military history of medieval Fooland}}.
• Option 4: Merge directly into :Category:Military history of Turkey; delete :Category:Battles of the Middle Ages by location. This is more closely in line with other recent precedents that upmerge or rename {{xt|Battles in Fooland}} to {{xt|Military history of (modern administrative unit)}}. However, this is quite a stretch, as the Republic of Turkey was not established until 1923, and the ancestors of modern Turks did not really enter Anatolia until the 11th century as Seljuks. Unlike other children of :Category:Middle Ages by country, there isn't a :Category:Medieval Turkey, nor is there any {{xt|Category:Military history of medieval Fooland}}.
  

:Nominator's rationale: WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN. This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 24#Category:Battles of the Byzantine–Bulgarian Wars in Thrace. All three were upmerged to :Category:Battles of the Byzantine–Bulgarian Wars without a location marker. Given all considerations, I would recommend Option 1, but I'm curious to hear what others have to say. NLeeuw (talk) 06:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Courtesy ping @Marcocapelle for follow-up. NLeeuw (talk) 06:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Prefer 1 too. Option 2 (having articles directly in a medieval category) would conflict with :Category:Conflicts by time which mostly contains battles and option 3 and 4 are far from ideal as already pointed out by nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge all except for :Category:Tang dynasty Taoists and :Category:Song dynasty Taoists. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:10th-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Jin (Later Tang precursor) Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:10th-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Min Kingdom Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:10th-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Southern Tang Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:10th-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Han dynasty Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Jin dynasty (266–420) Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Jin dynasty (1115–1234) Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Ming dynasty Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Northern and Southern dynasties Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Northern Wei Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Northern Zhou Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:6th-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Qing dynasty Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Sixteen Kingdoms Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Cheng Han Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:4th-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Song dynasty Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Sui dynasty Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Tang dynasty Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:* Propose merging :Category:Three Kingdoms Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:3rd-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Cao Wei Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:3rd-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Eastern Wu Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China and :Category:3rd-century Taoists

:* Propose merging :Category:Yuan dynasty Taoists to :Category:Taoists from Imperial China

:Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:OCEGRS, trivial intersection with religion. This is follow-up on this earlier discussion.

: {{ping|Smasongarrison|Omnis Scientia|Nederlandse Leeuw|Yinweiaiqing}} pinging contributors to previous discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Merge mer nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Question Okay, I am in favour of upmerging for now all those categories that have fewer than 5 items (I had recommended such a follow-up, so thanks for that!). But you would even upmerge a relatively well-populated category like :Category:Tang dynasty Taoists (26 P), as the specific dynasty is considered "trivial" in addition to each of these people being Taoists from Imperial China? Just making sure that we're all on the same page. NLeeuw (talk) 06:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

:* We might make an exception for the Song and Tang dynasty, since Taoism appears to be most widely accepted under these two dynasties. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Note to @Mason: In your last comment, you said to Yinweiaiqing {{xt|you have made A LOT of categories that are still underpopulated.}} That's probably not true. As far as I know, all the underpopulated categories that I listed for possible future upmerging were created by other people over the course of many years, some going back to 2010. These were not created by Yinweiaiqing a few days ago just to populate the :Category:People from Imperial China by religion. I didn't check all edit histories, but all categories I checked weren't newly created by Yinweiaiqing a few days ago. NLeeuw (talk) 06:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
• Merge for now for the tiny categories. Re; Good to know about Yinweiaiqing . I still stand by my repeated request that they populate their categories. But I do recognize that since I've raised the issue they haven't been making single person cateogories. Mason (talk) 11:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
• :Thanks for that clarification. :) NLeeuw (talk) 20:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 04:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Career achievements of snooker players to :Category:Career achievements of sportspeople

:Nominator's rationale: Upmerge per WP:NARROWCAT Let'srun (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::Merge 3-article category that is unlikely to grow. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge and purge. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 20:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Cartoon Network stubs}}

:Nominator's rationale: Stub category no longer populated enough to warrant retention. As always, stub categories need to have a minimum of 60 articles, but after I detagged a handful of articles that were too long to be tagged as stubs at all this went from 25 to 20. It has existed in its current form since 2011, after being deleted as underpopulated in 2007 -- but was then tagged as underpopulated again in 2018, until that template was deleted at TFD, so it's not entirely clear that it was ever really adequately populated at all.
Even the 20 pages that are here are a bit of a random grab bag, as it's populated mainly by video game or album tie-ins to Cartoon Network programming and/or foreign channels that franchised Cartoon Network or Boomerang branding, rather than things that actually have much to do with the {{cl|United States television stubs}} parent -- so it's not at all clear that there are actually very many things that could be added here to get it back over 60 articles again. It's not generally standard practice, at any rate, to stub-tag things for overly specific associations like particular TV networks; WikiProject Cartoon Network already has project templates on the talk pages anyway, so this isn't serving any important purpose that isn't already being served elsewhere. Bearcat (talk) 01:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

• Delete or possibly merge, to :Category:Animation stubs if the latter. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Delete or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Same question: delete or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• {{ping|Bearcat}} what is your opinion on merging? Marcocapelle (talk) 03:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::I'm of two minds. The international Cartoon Network or Boomerang franchise channels would be fine in {{cl|Animation stubs}}, but the tie-in albums probably don't belong there at all, the couple of actual TV shows in this category are already in {{cl|Animated television series stubs}} alongside this as it is and thus don't need to be double-filed in the general animation parent, and there's also a person in this grab-bag who wouldn't belong there. So merging would be fine, as long as there's a purge along with it. Bearcat (talk) 12:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::* Fair enough. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

::**{{ping|Marcocapelle}} Are you okay with merging and purging? HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 16:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

::*** {{ping|HouseBlaster}} yes I am. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename as per nom. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Rename :Category:Omaha (Native American) people to :Category:Omaha Tribe of Nebraska people

: Nominator's rationale As there is only one recognized Omaha tribe, the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska (that is the official tribal name on the [https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/12/2023-00504/indian-entities-recognized-by-and-eligible-to-receive-services-from-the-united-states-bureau-of federal register]), change this category's name to match the official name and get rid of the clunky parentheses. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 05:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

• No oppose, but wouldn't :Category:Omaha people be simpler? Marcocapelle (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
• :@Marcocapelle if I recall correctly that's what it was originally and then somebody changed it because they thought people would confuse it for people from the city of Omaha. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 02:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
• :* I see. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
• :Perhaps :Category:Omaha Tribe people would work. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 02:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
• Rename to :Category:Omaha people to match Omaha people, and because similarly ambiguous names like :Category:Iowa people/:Category:People from Iowa aren't disambiguated in this manner. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
• :@LaundryPizza03 That is what it was before. Here is a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_19#Category:Omaha_people link] to the previous discussion. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 06:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
• Iowa should be renamed as well. That just results in maintenance headaches -- 65.92.244.143 (talk) 22:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

• Support renaming to :Category:Omaha Tribe people or :Category:Omaha Tribe of Nebraska people. Noting that the parent cat is: :Category:Omaha Tribe of Nebraska. We have ambiguity due to the tribe name and the city name. And since the city is at Omaha due to WP:COMMONNAME, we should find a way to provide clarity. I think using the name that the tribe themselves use is an easy way forward. - jc37 19:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Rename target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Recommend renaming main article Omaha people to Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, to avoid future confusion. :Category:Omaha people is not in use because of its ambiguous name, so the main article runs the same risk. (It would have been convenient to rename the main article first and then speedy the category per WP:C2D, but oh well, here we are {{wink}}). NLeeuw (talk) 07:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
• :This cannot be done with Iowa people, which has two federally recognized tribes. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
• ::Fair enough, but that is not at issue here. NLeeuw (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Engineering colleges in Prakasham District to :Category:Engineering colleges in Andhra Pradesh

:Nominator's rationale: A category for Prakasham District doesn't exist. Upmerge Mason (talk) 01:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Dual merge, also to :Category:Universities and colleges in Prakasam district. A single-article category is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lt|Pop-band-stub}}

:Nominator's rationale: Stub template of unclear utility. It's only used on a grand total of ten articles, so it doesn't have its own dedicated stub category and instead just sorts those articles into the generic {{cl|Musical group stubs}} -- but because every last one of those ten articles features this template alongside a "Nationality-band-stub" template that sorts its articles into a more specific national or continental subcategory of {{cl|Musical group stubs}}, that means this template is adding nothing but unnecessary parent-and-child duplicate categorization. Bearcat (talk) 00:16, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. Agree with nominator/nomination. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.