Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 23#Category:Danish rheumatologists

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Organizations by event}}

:Nominator's rationale: delete but move sub:Category:Organizations by war directly under :Category:Organizations. Events in a vague concept and consequently the three subcategories have little in common. Besides calling wars and covid19 "events" is questionable since most of them took years and that is hardly a single event. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: dual merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Holocaust-denying films to :Category:Antisemitic films

:Nominator's rationale: Only two entries. Most antisemitic films deny the holocaust, and antisemitism is generally more defining - of the two in this category, Europa is solely about denying the holocaust, but the other is more generally antisemitic. Also merge to Holocaust denial (we could probably make a general holocaust-denying works category or something). PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Dual merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: split as suggested by Marcocapelle, and create :Category:Fascist publications. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Fascist newspapers and magazines to :Category:Fascist publications

:Nominator's rationale: The publications category tree is for "newspapers and magazines" (e.g. serialized publications). The and is clunky and excludes things that go in every other tree like this. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:40, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Split to :Category:Fascist newspapers and :Category:Fascist magazines, we normally keep newspapers and magazines separate. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
• :Eh, we also have publication categories. We could also do that split but I think a publications category is useful - there are going to be some non newspaper or magazine publications, including some already in this category PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
• :* :Category:Fascist publications could be created as a parent category. E.g. :Category:Magazines and :Category:Newspapers have :Category:Publications by format as a parent category. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
• :*:Also fine by me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: split as nominated. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose splitting :Category:Works by Ottoman people to :Category:Arts in the Ottoman Empire and :Category:Works by writers from the Ottoman Empire

:Nominator's rationale: This is an unnecessary layer over :category:Ottoman art. I added a subcat for a writer; after removing the art subcat, this should be renamed "by writer" and populated accordingly, corresponding to :Category:Writers from the Ottoman Empire. Reparent within :Category:Ottoman literature. – Fayenatic London 19:59, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Is there other content to populate :Category:Works by writers from the Ottoman Empire? If not, just leave the subcat in :Category:Ottoman literature and delete the nominated category. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• All I have found to add so far alongside {{c|Works by Fuzuli (poet)}} is {{c|Books by Kahlil Gibran}} and {{c|Novels by Reşat Nuri Güntekin}}. I think that's sufficient. – Fayenatic London 20:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
• Ok, then it should do. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Entertainers by populated place in Rhode Island to :Category:People by populated place and occupation in Rhode Island

:Nominator's rationale: Subcategory with just three entries. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Transhumanism in fiction to :Category:Fiction about transhumanism

:Nominator's rationale: Make the category more defining by eliminating edge cases, as with many similar categories. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:53, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Rename per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge to :Category:Slavic legendary creatures. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Nav'}}

:Nominator's rationale: There is no such categorization in reliable sources. None of the articles states that it belongs to this category. --Altenmann >talk 09:29, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Support in principle, but presumably merge to parent :Category:Slavic legendary creatures. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Right, merge. --Altenmann >talk 23:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1720s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1720s and :Category:Ballets set in the 18th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1760s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1760s and :Category:Ballets set in the 18th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1770s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1770s and :Category:Ballets set in the 18th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1820s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1820s and :Category:Ballets set in the 19th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1870s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1870s and :Category:Ballets set in the 19th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1880s (2 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1880s and :Category:Ballets set in the 19th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1890s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1890s and :Category:Ballets set in the 19th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1900s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1900s and :Category:Ballets set in the 20th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1910s (1 C, 3 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1910s and :Category:Ballets set in the 20th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets about World War I (1 P) to :Category:Works about World War I and :Category:World War I fiction and :Category:Ballets set in the 20th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1920s (3 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1920s and :Category:Ballets set in the 20th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1940s (1 C, 2 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1940s and :Category:Ballets set in the 20th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets about World War II (1 P) to :Category:Works about World War II and :Category:World War II fiction and :Category:Ballets set in the 20th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1960s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1960s and :Category:Ballets set in the 20th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 1970s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 1970s and :Category:Ballets set in the 20th century

:* Propose merging :Category:Ballets set in the 2010s (1 P) to :Category:Works set in the 2010s and :Category:Ballets set in the 21st century

:Nominator's rationale: merge, isolated and mostly single-article categories, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Ships of P&O (company) to :Category:Ships of P&O

:Nominator's rationale: C2D with P&O after it was moved in January 2023. Drenertou (talk) 04:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Rename, this wouldn't be an ambiguous name in combination with "ships of". Marcocapelle (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
• Rename, agree unambiguous. (If and when the American passenger liner company Penninsular & Occidental Steamship gets an article, a different solution would be required as they are/were both "companies".) - Davidships (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|VLS-equipped attack submarines}}

:Nominator's rationale: This is an overly granular, non-defining classification. The presence of vertical launch system tubes on an attack submarine is not defined as a distinct thing by any reliable source. (Note that the category creator seems to be attempting to WP:POVPUSH that this is a notable thing (it's not) having had an article on this concept snow-deleted at AfD.) The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:28, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Delete: It is not a term that it is used it is WP:OR. Melbguy05 (talk) 08:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Impeached Norway officials removed from office}}

:Nominator's rationale: error SecretName101 (talk) 02:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: merge as nominated. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose merging :Category:Bangladeshi rheumatologists to :Category:Rheumatologists

:Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry. Also merge with :Category:Bangladeshi physicians

Also nominating for merge:

• :Category:Bulgarian rheumatologists to :Category:Rheumatologists and :Category:Bulgarian physicians
• :Category:Colombian rheumatologists to :Category:Rheumatologists and :Category:Colombian physicians
• :Category:Czech rheumatologists to :Category:Rheumatologists and :Category:Czech physicians
• :Category:Danish rheumatologists to :Category:Rheumatologists and :Category:Danish physicians
• :Category:German rheumatologists to :Category:Rheumatologists and :Category:German physicians
• :Category:Israeli rheumatologists to :Category:Rheumatologists and :Category:Israeli physicians
• :Category:Swedish rheumatologists to :Category:Rheumatologists and :Category:Swedish physicians LibStar (talk) 01:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

:Comment LibStar, what is your reasoning here? You don't offer any explanation. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

::"Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry". No different from similar nominations I have made. LibStar (talk) 02:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Dual merge, these are not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose renaming :Category:Hydro-Tasmania to :Category:Hydro Tasmania

:Nominator's rationale: C2D with Hydro Tasmania Ahaohahg (talk) 01:27, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

• Rename per nom. I suppose this could have listed at speedy. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:25, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|NYC LPC list missing coordinates}}

:Nominator's rationale: There are less than 10 articles that use {{tl|NYC LPC row}} and could possibly populate this category (at most times, including now, it's zero.) I have adjusted that template to instead add articles to :Category:New York City articles missing geocoordinate data. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Category:Yellowstone task force articles needing attention}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Category:Yellowstone task force articles missing geocoordinate data}}

:* Propose deleting {{lc|Category:Yellowstone task force articles needing infoboxes}}

:Nominator's rationale: Empty maintenance categories from a task force with <50 articles. These maintenance categories are unlikely to be needed - there's unlikely to be any significant number of additional articles needing coordinates, infoboxes, or other attention. See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 8#Washington Metro articles needing attention for a recent discussion of similar categories. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

----

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.