Login
Login

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Faedra

{{NOINDEX|visible=yes}}

{{divbox|fawn|Contributor copyright investigation|

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.}}

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

=Text=

  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.

:*Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.

:*If you remove text presumptively, place {{tlsp|CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.

:*If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{tls|cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.

:*If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{tls|copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.

:*To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{tlsp|CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.

  • After examining an article:

:*replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether a problem was found (add {{tl|y}}) or not (add {{tl|n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{tl|y}}. The {{tl|?}} template may be used for articles where you were unable to determine whether or not a violation occurred, but are prepared to remove the article from consideration – either because the material is no longer present in the article, or it is adequately paraphrased so as to no longer be a violation (please specify which).

:*Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)

  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{tl|collapse top}} and {{tl|collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

=Images=

  • Examine the images below. For free images:
  • Does the image look non-free? Is it likely the uploader is the copyright holder?
  • Is the image properly licensed and sourced? Be aware of images that say "this image is licensed under X" without specifying who created it.
  • Do a reverse image search using Google Images. Check the license of the source page. Compare the last modified time with the (Commons) upload time.
  • Do a Google image search for phrases that describe the image's contents.
  • See Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion#Addressing suspected copyright infringement on dealing with cases of possible image copyright infringement. There is no need to open a possibly unfree files listing. Administrators may delete images from multiple point infringers presumptively in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Evaluators who are not administrators may section images into a "deletion requested" section for administrator attention.
  • For non-free images, determine whether each image meets our non-free content criteria.
  • Note that Commons does not accept non-free content.
  • Annotate the listing with the action taken, e.g. if the image was tagged no source write "no source"; if the fair use claim is deemed ok you can write "OK fair use".

Background

  • {{User5|Faedra}}
  • Check requested by Justlettersandnumbers (talk)
  • This dates from 2004. :Culmer White was listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2016 February 1 and turned out to be a foundational copy-paste from [http://arthurmicklethwaite.htmlplanet.com/boatmans_tales_by_S_Holbourn/A_Boatmans_tales_S_Holbourns_study_of_lifeboat_rescues_shipwrights_and_local_families_02.htm here]. I looked further and found problems with:

:* {{oldid|Lionel Lukin|4141492|Lionel Lukin}}, from [http://arthurmicklethwaite.htmlplanet.com/boatmans_tales_by_S_Holbourn/Boatmans_tales_original_lifeboat_story.htm here]; that could have been copied from us, but it'd have to have been during the 10 hours before "principals" was corrected to "principles" (NB some content was split off to William Wouldhave)

:* {{oldid|Mary White (lifeboat)|3979381|Mary White (lifeboat)]], from [http://arthurmicklethwaite.htmlplanet.com/boatmans_tales_by_S_Holbourn/A_Boatmans_tales_S_Holbourns_study_of_lifeboat_rescues_shipwrights_and_local_families_01.htm here]

:* {{oldid|Dud Dudley|4031603|Dud Dudley}}, from [https://archive.org/stream/industrialbiogr05smilgoog#page/n76/mode/2up/search/Dudley this PD book]: unacknowledged plagiarism, not copyvio; on the talk page the user states that "The item is my own work"

:* {{oldid|Richard Hoborn|3934322|Richard Hoborn}}, from [http://arthurmicklethwaite.htmlplanet.com/Kings_carpenters_and_heretics_by_S_Holbourn/KINGS_CARPENTERS_AND_HERETICS_04_BY%20S_HOLBURNE.HTM here]

:* {{oldid|Hamo de Crevequer|5423285|Hamo de Crevequer}}, plagiarised from [https://books.google.it/books?id=pUALAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA244 this PD book], possibly via an incompetently digitised version such as [https://web.archive.org/web/20110717090358/http://www.deloriahurst.com/deloriahurst%20page/1629.html this] (NB "de Cregrave;vecœur" for ""de Crèvecœur")

:All the confirmed copyvios are from the same website, so there's a possibility that the editor was also the author (the eccentric spelling and grammar are not dissimilar); some of that material may originally have been drawn from PD sources and merely require attribution. However, given the evident concerns about these edits at the time, I think this has to be looked at, both for copyright/attribution reasons and because of the very dubious nature of much of the material. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

=Contribution survey=

This report covers contributions to 212 articles from timestamp 2004-06-01 10:37:15 UTC to timestamp 2004-10-11 10:07:15 UTC.

Articles 1 through 20

Articles 21 through 40

Articles 41 through 60

Articles 61 through 80

Articles 81 through 100

Articles 101 through 120

Articles 121 through 140

Articles 141 through 160

Articles 161 through 180

{{collapse top}}

{{collapse bottom}}

Articles 181 through 212

{{collapse top}}

This report generated by [http://tools.wmflabs.org/contributionsurveyor/survey.php?user=Faedra&hide_reverts=&hide_minor_edits=on&articles_per_section=20&major_edit_char_count=250&offset=0&limit=500&start_timestamp=&end_timestamp=20170523230436&output=wiki Contribution Surveyor] at 2017-05-23T23:04:51+00:00 in 0.31 sec.

{{collapse bottom}}