Wikipedia:Faster editing
{{essay|WP:FASTER|WP:Faster}}
There are several methods for faster editing of pages. Wikipedia currently contains over {{#expr: ( {{NUMBEROFARTICLES:R}} - 50000) / 1E6 round 1}} million articles, so rapid editing allows more pages to be updated or added. Faster-editing tactics include (each linked below): disable extra screen formatting, use a personal text editor, use utility templates, ask other people,
Disable extra screen formatting
There are aspects of Wikipedia screen-display formatting which can slow some browsers for several seconds, or even delay the viewing by several minutes every hour. In the Special:Preferences page, set the following option, under the tab for "Editing", then click [SAVE] preferences.
::
valign=top |
: Editing: ::: [_] Enable the editing toolbar |
This option has an effect on the speed of redisplaying the screen.
Use a personal text editor
For some people, they already know quick ways to edit text, by using their own personal text editor on their computers. For editing many pages, the fastest updates can often be made by wp:copy/paste of the edit-buffer markup text into an external text-editor program. After extensive or rapid edits, the text can be copy/pasted back into the Wikipedia edit-screen for more edit-previewing when reformatting with the current templates others might have updated.
Use utility templates
There are many pre-canned, specially-designed templates which can accept certain parameters and generate the formatted output. Among the most-common are:
::* Template:nowrap - join separate words to stop wrapping (as:
::* Template:Convert - for conversions of measurements into other unit names/symbols
::* Template:ns - to insert 1-80 non-breaking spaces to separate text
::* Template:bg - to set the {{bg|#e7e7ff| background }} color of text
For a larger list of other templates, see:
Ask other people
Perhaps the best 'text editor' is another person with time to work, and so perhaps, just ask other people if they would like to edit the pages that need to be updated. An experienced editor might update a page within just a few minutes which would take another editor hours of tedious frustration to accomplish. Some editors have canned scripts or other tools to quickly perform numerous cumbersome changes. For some pages, it can be amazing how fast others are willing to help, if contacted.
Let others fix it
In some cases, the nature of the topic will automatically attract numerous other editors who are likely to edit the related pages and update the text, such as for current events in the news. Use that fact to re-focus efforts on selected areas where other people would be less likely to perform the edits. In general, by shifting focus into the neglected areas, then more tasks can be accomplished overall, by allowing other people to edit/update the most-popular areas and broaden the work by enabling others to help in areas they would feel comfortable. If the help seems slow in coming, then perhaps consider posting a reminder to various noticeboards, to kick start additional work from other users eager to help.
Let it go
In many cases, the work can be resolved instantly, by letting it go. There are often situations where people have imagined unrealistic needs to have pages edited, but from a larger perspective, there is really no need to rush. One of the most misleading perceptions is the goal of "consistency" such as having 700 articles all share a similar format; however, most people either do not view enough of the 700 pages to notice the inconsistent formats or they just simply do not care when viewing other styles. Instead, consider the 80/20 Rule, where about "80%" of issues are found in roughly "20%" of pages. In extreme cases, there might be a 99/1 split, where 99% of all readers view only 1% of those articles, and the remaining 99% of those pages do not need the consistency, or rearrangement, or numerous details of the 1% being viewed most often. Even in cases of 70/30, then consider editing mainly the 30% of pages being viewed more often as the higher priority, and leave the rare 65% for another time. It is far more important to update an article read very often, rather than obsess about rare pages read very rarely. Prioritize and learn when to let it go.