Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Proceratosaurus/archive1

{{Fa top|result = promoted by FrB.TG via FACBot (talk) 28 June 2025 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Proceratosaurus/archive1&diff=1297831092&oldid=1297831092]}}

=[[Proceratosaurus]]=

:Nominator(s): FunkMonk (talk) 00:39, 20 May 2025 (UTC), IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 02:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC); A Cynical Idealist (talk) 03:36, 20 May 2025 (UTC), Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:20, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

This article is about the oldest known tyrannosauroid, though dramatically different from its later, more famous relatives like Tyrannosaurus in being quite small and with a crest beginning at the snout. While first named over a century ago, little was published about it until the last few decades, and we have summarised all of it here. FunkMonk (talk) 00:39, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

:Joining as co-nominator as agreed, focusing on revisions for things such as references and formattings. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 02:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

==HF (support)==

I plan to review this tomorrow. Hog Farm Talk 00:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

  • "Creisler, B. (July 7, 2003). "Dinosauria translation and pronunciation guide P". Archived from the original on August 18, 2010. Retrieved April 28, 2025." - needs publisher in the citation

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

  • "as well as the shape of the maxilla (the main tooth bearing upper jaw bone) and squamosal (a bone towards the back of the skull) as well as the shape of the external nares (bony nostril openings) and the infratemporal fenestra (the skull opening behind the orbit/eye socket) as distinctive" - is it possible to avoid the duplication of the "as well as the" construction in a single sentence?

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

  • "Von Huene considered the crest, as well as the shape of the maxilla (the main tooth bearing upper jaw bone) and squamosal (a bone towards the back of the skull) as well as the shape of the external nares (bony nostril openings) and the infratemporal fenestra (the skull opening behind the orbit/eye socket) as distinctive,[7][8] considering the crest, which he thought to represent the base of a nasal horn, as a feature supporting its relationship with Ceratosaurus.[9]" - "considered the crest" and "considering the cest" in the same sentence? The whole sentence seems very convoluted.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

  • "3 m (9.8 ft) in length." - I would recommend rounding this the conversion to feet, given that the meter conversion is rounded here in the lead?

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

  • The link to Dilong in the first paragraph of the description section seems to be wrong - do you want Dilong paradoxus?

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

  • "Well preserved fossils of the related tyrannosauroids Yutyrannus and Dilong indicate that they were covered in relatively simple feathers in life, similar to the down feathers of modern birds" - this feels tacked on. There's obviously not going to be fossil evidence support to confirm/deny feathers for Proceratosaurus given that only a partial skull is available for this dinor. But is there actually direct speculation as to feather presence on Proceratosaurus? Are the two tyrannosauroids listed particularly close relations? If there's no direct discussion in the sources regarding feathers here, I don't know that this is really appropriate to include. Are there other related tynrannosauroids that lack feathers?

:: Hone explicitly states in the source: {{tq|Feathers are rarely preserved as the conditions for their preservation have to be near perfect, and we have to be lucky enough to find fossils of feathered specimens. Thus even though only two tyrannosaurs are directly known to have had feathers, it is reasonable to infer that all of them did.}} I've modified the sentence to be more explicit about this. Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

  • "The presence of tyrannosauroids such as Proceratosaurus in the Bathonian" - would recommend linking Bathonian here as it is the first use

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

This is in good shape overall. Hog Farm Talk 02:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

: Supporting from a non-expert perspective. Hog Farm Talk 15:58, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

==RoySmith (support)==

  • {{tq|discovered some time prior}} I assume we know when, so be more specific: "discovered X years earlier".

:: I looked into this, and I genuinely could not find out when the skull was discovered. The original 1910 description does not say, only "At last, however,' Mr. F. Lewis Bradley, F.G.S., has been able to submit to the Society the greater part of a skull obtained some time ago from the Great Oolite in an excavation for a reservoir at Minehinhampton (Gloucestershire)" [https://zenodo.org/records/2491937]. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::I don't know how much faith to put in it (possibly none at all), but https://australian.museum/learn/dinosaurs/fact-sheets/proceratosaurus-bradleyi/ claims Bradley "discovered the first specimen in the early 1900s". RoySmith (talk) 00:13, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:::That same page also claims the CT scan was done in 2010. RoySmith (talk) 00:14, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

::::The Arthur Smith Woodward book chapter confirms that the preparation and CT scanning occurred in 2010, but there's no confirmation about the date of the excavation of Proceratosaurus. Given the distance from the source, the "early 1900s" is probably just a reasonable speculation on the part of the author of the Australian Museum article, and I don't place any weight on it. Getting a proper answer on this would probably require deep archival digging that would probably go into WP:OR territory. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq|Minchinhampton, a town in the Cotswolds in Gloucestershire, South West England.[1]}} Just saying "Minchinhampton, in South West England" is enough. Knowing the full political structure of the UK doesn't help the reader understand the subject.

:: Truncated. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:17, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq|made the skull the holotype specimen of a new species}} I know just a little about taxonomy; I'm familiar with type specimen but not "holotype specimen", so that needs a bit of explanation.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::Hmmm. I'm sure to an expert, it's obvious what this means, but I'm still finding it a bit puzzling. It's also not entirely clear what it means to "move" a species. Reading the introduction to Rauhut et al, I understand it completely, so perhaps hew a bit closer to how they describe the situation and include some more of the details (obviously within the constraints of WP:CLOP? RoySmith (talk) 13:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Hopefully I've fixed this without getting too much into technical jargon. Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:26, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq|maxilla and squamosal bones}} explain what these are. I assume maxilla has something to do with the jaw, but I have no clue what squamosal is.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq|infratemporal fenestra}} likewise.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq|However, later research showed}} "However, Rauhut et al later showed ..."

:: I think some researchers had disputed it before this, but fixed and moved to the bottom of the section so the Rahut study could be properly introduced. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq|The holotype skull was since CT scanned}} Be more specific: "In , the holotype skull was CT scanned ..."

:: This isn't specified in the source, but it was CT scanned as part of the project to redescribe the specimen, so I've mentioned that. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:04, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq|The only known skull of Proceratosaurus is 26.9 cm (10.6 in) long as preserved}} I think you're missing the word "is"?

:: To my native English speaking self, this seems like okay grammar to me without the "is" (I'm not sure where the "is" is supposed to be inserted, presumably in "as preserved"?) but I'll let others chime in. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::: "as preserved" looks a lot more common than "as is preserved" looking at ngram data [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=as+preserved%2Cas+is+preserved&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=0&case_insensitive=false/] Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq| its longest axis is not horizontal but inclined upwards at an angle of approximately 30 degrees}} looking at the various illustrations (ex :File:ProceratosaurusBradleyiSize.png), I'm not seeing this.

:: I'm not sure what you mean. It's an internal feature of the skull that wouldn't really be visible in life or silhouette. It's in comparison to Guanlong, where the difference in the orientation of the nasal fenestra (the big black opening at the front of the skull is quite apparent. [https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/51bf1cd3e4b0a897bf54112b/1410070139912-62B4Q52C8TTPPQ71MA6K/image-asset.jpeg?format=2500w] Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::Could you add some of that explanation to the article? RoySmith (talk) 23:47, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::: I've changed "longest axis" to "maximum length". Hope this is more clear. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:11, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

::::I suspect this is a case of you knowing this stuff inside and out so it's all obvious, but I'm still struggling. Perhaps you could prepare versions of :File:Proceratosaurus bradleyi Skull Reconstruction (alt).png and :File:GuanlongWucaiiSkulls.png which have all of these features labeled, similar to :File:Massospondylus Skull Steveoc 86.png? RoySmith (talk) 15:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::I've provided a version of the Proceratosaurus image with all the skull parts labelled, as well as provided the Guanlong restoration (which is unmodified) in a double image for comparison. I think the reader will be able to infer what parts of the skull of Guanlong are which from the labels on the Proceratosaurus image. The Proceratosaurus image was reuploaded over the old one, so you may need to refresh your cache or use incognito to see it. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq| though one opinion published in 2000}} Hmm, this is Rauhut again. You seem to be shy about giving him credit :-)

:: This isn't referring to Rahut 2010, this referencing Rahut 2010 quoting the opinion of another study "Madsen JH, Welles SP 2000. Ceratosaurus(Dinosauria, Theropoda). A revised osteology. Miscellaneous Publication, Utah Geological Survey 00-2: 1–80.". Would it be better to directly cite this study? Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::Yeah, I think citing the underlying source would make more sense. RoySmith (talk) 23:49, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::: Added direct supplementary citations to that section. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:11, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

  • You use the term "basal" in a few places (basal theropod, basal coelurosaur, basal thyreophorans). You should explain what that means.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:16, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq| causing the theropods teeth to slice}}, theropods -> theropod's

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Be consistent about "bite force" vs "biteforce".

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:09, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::Fixed properly. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

  • {{tq|The exact layer of stratum in which Proceratosaurus was discovered}} isn't "layer" the same as "stratum"?

:: Changed to "stratigraphic layer". Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

That's it for me on a first read-through. RoySmith (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:@RoySmith are all your issues dealt with or do you have any additional comments? Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

::My apologies for leaving you wondering. I'm going to put this on the back burner for now but I'll come back at some point and take another look. If this slips down into "Older nominations" and I haven't come back by then, please ping me. RoySmith (talk) 17:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm going to call this a support from me at least as far as being well written and approachable to a non-expert. I dont know enough about paleontology to express an opinion on whether it is comprehensive or well-researched, but I assmume we will get some SMEs to chime in on that. RoySmith (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

==Cas Liber (Support)==

Taking a look now...Cas Liber (talk · contribs)

::"It was originally described as a species of Megalosaurus in 1910, M. bradleyi, but this species was moved to its own genus, Proceratosaurus, in 1926." - why not just "It was originally described as a species of Megalosaurus in 1910, M. bradleyi, but was moved to its own genus, Proceratosaurus, in 1926." (reduces the odd-sounding repetition)

::: Changed to your proposed version. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::Why no hyphen/dash in "D shaped"?

::: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::due to perceived resemblance of Proceratosaurus incomplete cranial crest to Ceratosaurus nasal horn - if the dinosaur names are used in possessive here, should be Proceratosaurus' and Ceratosaurus' - or otherwise we need definite articles (or something) here...?

::: Added apostrophes. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::A diverse marine assemblage is known from the Great Oolite Group... - discussing marine life in this article seems to be straying a bit far. Context is good but this last sentence strikes me as overinclusive.

::: Removed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Otherwise looking okay wrt comprehensiveness and prose Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{Ping|Casliber}} I've attempted to fix your concerns. Do you have any further comments? Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

::Nah - looks good Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

==Gog the Mild (support)==

Recusing to review.

  • Buffetaut et al needs an OCLC (4903807720)

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • What rule are you using when deciding whether to give a publisher location.

:: I'll let {{Ping|IJReid}} handle this one. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

:: On second thoughts it seems easier just to remove all of the locations, which I have done. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "with lower jaws". If it is a singular jaw, why the s?

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "Proceratosaurus likely had a diet consisting of relatively small prey." Perhaps first mention that it is carnivorous and/or a predator?

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Thanks. As the lead is a summary of the main article, could this be mentioned there too?

:::: I've gone and mentioned this in the paleobiology section. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::So the article now has "Proceratosaurids were generally small-bodied carnivorous animals" in the main article, and "Proceratosaurus is thought to have been a carnivore" in the lead. Either is fine, and I realise that Proceratosaurids is not the same as Proceratosaurus, and that there is a "generally" in there, but it looks like a contradiction. Would you care to have a second look at this?

:::::: Rewrote the whole section. Removed "small" as a number of studes recover the quite large Yutyrannus and Sinotyrannus as proceratosaurids. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:44, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "undergoing further mechanical preparation". Any chance of some further explanation or rephrasing, so a non-expert reader would know what this means?

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "as well as being CT scanned at the University of Texas during the same year as part of this project." Given that you are still in the same sentence and that the clause starts "as well as" I think we could do without "as part of this project."

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "These authors found the holotype specimen to be at least a sub-adult dinosaur, as the bone did not show features associated with juveniles" Why does this need pointing out so firmly?

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "around 7 cm (2.8 in) long". You need to attach a verb to this.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "The partially preserved orbit (eye socket) has an inverted egg-shape, and was probably marginally taller than long when complete, with a maximum estimated complete height of 6 cm (2.4 in), and a measured length of 5.55 cm (2.19 in), respectively." I don't think you need "respectively".

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "a large pneumatic (hollow) crest that ran across the midline of the skull". Across or along?

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "(bone that supported the tongue)". Add a definite article to the front.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "Later study during the 1930s" Do we need "Later"? I mean, it's pretty obvious that the 1930s are later than 1910.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • You join words with slashes several times. primitive/early diverging; margin/border; orbit/eye socket etc MOS:SLASH advises against, suggesting "Replace with clearer wording."

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

  • "(landmass consisting of North America and Greenland)". Needs to start with an indefinite article.

:: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Great article. A joy to read. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{Ping|Gog the Mild}} any further comments? Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

:::The two images in "Description" form a slight sandwich. I suggest dropping the skull one down a bit.

:::: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

:::One comeback above and one additional point I noticed. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

==Image and source review==

ALT text seems to be mostly missing/base. Image placement is OK. Where in the source is :File:Proceratosaurus holotype skull.jpg? What do the colours in :File:Proceratosaurus bradleyi Skull Reconstruction (alt).png and :File:GuanlongWucaiiSkulls.png mean? With the latter image, I also wonder about where the information was drawn from. The sources for :File:Megalosaurus dinosaur.png are mostly broken/have uncertain reliability status. The source for :File:Proceratosaurus skull.jpg took so long to load that I can't verify it. The date formatting of the citations is all inconsistent. I don't think that [https://web.archive.org/web/20170729150848/https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00591.x these] [https://web.archive.org/web/20250418040532/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016787808802581 archives] are necessary. What makes [https://www.dinosauria.com/ this] and [https://www.mindat.org/paleo_collection.php?col=39075 this] a reliable source? "Carnivorous Saurischia in Europe since the Triassic" has no URL when other sources do. Is "Ceratosaurus (Dinosauria, Theropoda). A revised osteology" a book or some other type of source? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

:The source for :File:Proceratosaurus holotype skull.jpg does include the file (near bottom above the Location map), but it looks like the NHMUK online images database is broken currently. Sources have been added for the information in :File:GuanlongWucaiiSkulls.png, sources have been clarified in :File:Megalosaurus dinosaur.png and :File:Proceratosaurus skull.jpg. I will revise citations next, the archival links seem to have been added semi-automatically. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 16:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

:Archives for journal websites removed, url links to journal websites (when doi links to same place) removed. All dates are formatted consistently, either as year-only as is standard for journal or book citations in the field, or with year-month-date citations as is standard for websites or access dates. I can revise them all further if its required. Ben Criesler (Dinosauria Online) is a reliable citation for names and pronunciation as can be seen by his published works [https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1zxz1md here (chapter 10)] [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02724634.1994.10011546 here] or [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.1992.10011462 here] or acknowledgements [https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lG0b3bcjxqAC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Ben+Creisler&ots=i9ASCuFZAL&sig=S6f9QZ_IitoeXsbL_kL_3ulkK-o&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Ben%20Creisler&f=false here] or [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02724634.1997.10010990 here]. I replaced the link to Mindat with the appropriate original source of the Paleobiology Database, which is an established and cited tool in literature. Links and clarifications are given for "Carnivorous Saurischia in Europe..." and "Ceratosaurus... a revised osteology". Hope this satisfies the source review. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 16:51, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

: The archive for the OUP description paper was included because the article is currently paywalled but historically was freely accessible. The images didn't load properly on the archive so I don't think removing it that big of a deal. CERATOSAURUS (DINOSAURIA, THEROPODA) A REVISED OSTEOLOGY says in the opening pages {{tq|The Miscellaneous Publication Series of the Utah Geological Survey provides non-UGS authors with a high-quality format for papers concerning Utah geology and paleontology. Although reviews have been incorporated, this publication does not necessarily conform to UGS technical, policy, or editorial standards.}} so it's clearly a paper rather than a book. Megalosaurus dinosaur.png has been very heavily revised to be almost an entirely different image from its original version [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/b/bb/20131227014125%21Megalosaurus_dinosaur.png], for which those unreliable sources were used as references, so I don't think the sourcing issues is applicable, as the current version of the file is clearly based on reliable academic sources. I've added explanations of the meanings of the colours for Proceratosaurus bradleyi Skull Reconstruction (alt).png and File:GuanlongWucaiiSkulls.png. I would concur with IJReid that Ben Creisler is a reliable academic expert source of the pronounciations of Greco-Latin scientific names. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

: Alt text has been added. {{Ping|Jo-Jo Eumerus}} is this sufficient, or do you have further comments? Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

::Some of that ALT text might need improvement; e.g :File:ProceratosaurusBradleyiSize.png doesn't provide information on the size of the dinosaur. At least my understanding of ALT text is that it has to substitute the information provided in the image, if there is any. The date formats are still inconsistent; sometimes numbers separated by hyphens, sometimes months spelled out. Everything else seems OK now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:39, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

: {{Ping|Jo-Jo Eumerus}} I've changed the dates so all sources are now given as years only, and also changed the alt-text of ProceratosaurusBradleyiSize.png to be more descriptive. Is this enough? If you have more images in mind where you think the alt text needs improving, can you name them specifically? Hemiauchenia (talk) 09:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

::The map and the stress image ALTs might work better if they actually present some of the information in the image (e.g a short statement of what Central Europe was that time). The date format is still inconsistent - the archive dates are in year-hyphen-month-hyphen-day and #1 in month-comma-day-year. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

:::@IJReid can you handle the archive dates? Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

::: Fixed the alt text for the map and stress image. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

::::@Jo-Jo Eumerus all dates are now consistent. IJReid {{T - C - D - R}} 23:49, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::Looks like this works now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 05:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

{{FACClosed|promoted}} FrB.TG (talk) 20:05, 28 June 2025 (UTC){{Fa bottom}}