Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Windows 8.1/archive1

:Nominator(s): ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

The article is nicely written, and can be featured on the Main Page. ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! Per the instructions at the top of WP:FAC, "Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article before nominating it." I'd suggest withdrawal and advise you to get a bit more experience in editing the article before considering a nomination. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:46, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

:I agree: the nominator has no edits on this article. Also, the body of the article has two unsourced paragraphs and a citation-needed tag, which should have been addressed before the nomination. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Procedural oppose The nominator is yet to make an edit to this article. MSincccc (talk) 08:36, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

:I made changes an hour ago. ILoveRuffRuffman2013 (talk) 16:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

::The featured articles candidates page states that:

::{{green|Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article before nominating it.}} MSincccc (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Oppose

• Unreferenced paragraphs, virtually no contributions to the article, no evidence of the major contributors to the article having been contacted, prose issues, unexplained abbreviations, too technical, and more. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

ILoveRuffRuffman2013, can I suggest you request a withdrawal on this? It’s not going to improve from here. - SchroCat (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

:Looks like the user is blocked now as well... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

{{FACClosed|archived}} Ian Rose (talk) 00:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC){{Fa bottom}}