Wikipedia:Featured article review/Dartmouth College/archive1

:Notified: Kane5187, ElKevbo, Esrever, Contributor321, Hal333, WP New Hampshire, WP Dartmouth, WP Higher Education, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ADartmouth_College&type=revision&diff=991591065&oldid=991589066 talk page notice 2020-11-30]

This is a 2007 FA that has not been maintained to FA standards, and that has not been improved since the talk page notice six months ago. Issues include poor image layout, out of control galleries, listiness and single-sentence paragraphs, citation overkill, incomplete citations, dated information, uncited text, inadequate use of summary style (especially noticeable in the alumni section), and the lead reads as promotional rather than a summary of the article. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments from HAL333

• Images lack alt text.
• The largest problem is the near complete reliance on primary sources published by Dartmouth.
• Most, if not all, of the citations in the lede should be removed per WP:LEADCITE.

Those are the most glaring big picture issues I see. ~ HAL333 21:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

• Move to FARC - no engagement. Hog Farm _Talk 20:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
• Move to FARC Agree with Hog Farm. ~ HAL333 23:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

:Issues raised in the review section include sourcing, organization and coverage. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

• Delist Lots of issues with sourcing. None have been addressed. ~ HAL333 01:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
• Delist - lots of work needed; basically no engagement. Hog Farm _Talk 03:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
• Delist, significant unaddressed issues. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

{{FARClosed|delisted}} Nikkimaria (talk) 03:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.