Wikipedia:Featured article review/European Commission/archive1

:Notified: JLogan, WP European Union, WP Politics, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AEuropean_Commission&type=revision&diff=949627109&oldid=938276810 notice]

While this doesn't look terrible from a casual glance, this has definite issues the closer I look at this. Some of these aren't quite glaring, so I'll take more space to enumerate them here than I'd normally like.

• The Delors Commission section is mostly a single quote
• I suspect that Barroso Commission section may be undue weight
• Juncker Commission may be too little weight
• The commission sections don't have a clear chronological flow of when each one ends, IMO
• Bits of outdated material and statistics throughout.
• Some of the criticism stuff, like the IT bit, is rather vague.
• Initiatives seems to just be cherry-picking two of them, it seems like the Commission has probably done more than two initiatives.

Looks to me like this needs significant work. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:40, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

:{{u|Naypta}}, pinging you in the off chance you would be interested in saving this article. It would be a shame if it gets demoted. Femke Nijsse (talk) 11:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

• Move to FARC, zero engagement since nomination. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
• Move to FARC - Only edits since nomination are a cosmetic Monkbot edit and a minor AWB run fixing capitalization errors. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

:Issues raised in the review section include weighting and comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delist - Issues still not addressed. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
• Delist, no engagement to address issues. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

{{FARClosed|delisted}} Nikkimaria (talk) 18:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.