Wikipedia:Featured article review/Saffron/archive1

=[[Saffron]]=

==Review section==

This is a 2006 promotion with numerous issues noted on talk [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Saffron&oldid=655541134#FAR_needed over a long period of time.] These include [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saffron&oldid=657379107#Use biomedical claims] that need MEDRS-compliant sources. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

{{PMID|25072266}} could be addressed for comprehensiveness. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

{{PMID|23538079}} needs to be examined for MEDRS. Adverse effects per {{PMID|23472485}} should be discussed. {{PMID|22432635}} and {{PMID|23971874}} are not used.

There are numerous harv ref errors, so it's unclear which sources are being used without checking one by one. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

==FARC section==

:Concerns raised in the review section include sourcing and coverage. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delist, no progress. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delist. Tagged as dubious in the lead and for citation needed in the first section. Entire paragraphs, which are full of peacock and weasel words such as "strongest", "very high quality", "real", "undermining", "extremely", "poorest", "finest", "greater", and "typically", are unattributed. DrKiernan (talk) 12:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

{{FARClosed|delisted}} Nikkimaria (talk) 01:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.