Login
Login

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ECW Television Champions

:The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 22:51, 13 December 2008 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=257784089].

----

=[[List of ECW Television Champions]]=

Co-nominating with IMatthew: This article follows the examples of the FLs, List of WCW World Tag Team Champions and List of WCW Hardcore Champions, and as a result has a comprehensive prose and list the content in a comprehensive manner. Any comments, however, will be addressed by Matt or myself.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 23:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • No bolding of the article title in the lead?

:* WP:BOLDTITLE isn't necessary if it doesn't repeat the title verbatim Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

:**Exactly what Matthew said :)--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

:***That's good to know. Thanks. Nikki♥311 22:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Not sure if there is a way to fix it, but the Google Books url is visible in the references. ETA: This might be because it is also lacking the book's title.
  • I added the title, its fixed now.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Why did Osbourne have to vacate the title and WWE not acknowledge his reign?
  • Its unknown per official records, so I added that it was unknown for both instances that you mentioned.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Nikki♥311 03:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Support, my comments were resolved and after another look over the article, everything seems to be in order. Nikki♥311 18:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • "ECW was a subsidiary for the National Wrestling Alliance (NWA)," -- surely a subsidiary of?
  • I knew it read weird, I couldn't think of the right term. Fixed.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • "ECW, however, withdrew as a subsidiary of the NWA in 1994, and as a result, ECW gained ownership of the copyrights to its championships." --> "ECW withdrew as a subsidiary in 1994 and gained ownership of the copyrights to its championships."
  • Fixed.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • "The championship remained active until April 2001, after ECW filed for bankruptcy." I think "after" is the wrong word here, perhaps. Does it mean it "remained active until April 2001, even after ECW filed for bankrupcy", or "remained active until April 2001, when ECW filed for bankrupcy"?
  • Changed to when.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • "mid–2003" hyphen, not dash
  • Fixed.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • "The ECW Championship was the only former ECW title reactivated by WWE for the new brand.[4] The ECW Television Title history was, however, published by WWE on its website, although it excluded various reigns after edits by WWE.[5]" --> "The ECW Championship was the only former ECW title reactivated by WWE for the new brand,[4] although the ECW Television Title history was published by WWE on its website; however, it fails to include various reigns.[5]"
  • Fixed.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • "Hoynou legitimately injured his ankle" who?
  • Woops, I meant Hotbody (the previous champion).--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
  • "ECW forced Osbourne to vacate the title." why?
  • I added that it was for unknown reasons.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 21:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) {{Hidden|titlestyle = background-color: #00FFFF;|contentstyle = border:1px #4682B4 solid;padding:10px;|header=Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk)|content=Comments from {{User|Dabomb87}}

  • "Originally, ECW was a subsidiary of the National Wrestling Alliance (NWA), a promotion which had numerous subsidiaries." "which"-->that.
  • Done.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 18:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
  • "The ECW Championship was the only former ECW title reactivated by WWE for the new brand"-->The ECW Championship was the only former ECW title to be reactivated by WWE for the new brand...
  • Done.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 18:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Use centered em dashes for the vacated reign cells in the table.
  • Sources:
  • Both general sources need last access dates
  • Ref 2 needs format=PDF added to it. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Done both.--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 18:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

}}

:Dammit, I can't find myself getting here fast enough to reply! ;) Cheers, ayematthew ✡ 19:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

::You gotta be quicker man. :P--User:SRXUser talk:SRXSpecial:Contributions/SRX 20:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

{{Hidden|titlestyle = background-color: #5C2F83;|contentstyle = border:1px #5C2F83 solid;padding:10px;|header=Resolved comments from -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24|content=

;Comments

Best of luck, -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 02:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.