Wikipedia:Getting to Philosophy
{{short description|Wikipedia phenomenon in which ~97% of all articles link to Philosophy}}
{{Shortcut|WP:GTP}}
{{Ambox|text=Do not make edits to articles that are motivated by the concepts on this page. Such edits are purely disruptive and are quickly reverted, as they clearly do not improve the encyclopedia.}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2023|cs1-dates=y}}
{{Use list-defined references|date=September 2023}}
Following the first hyperlink in the main text of an English Wikipedia article, and then repeating the process for subsequent articles, usually leads to the Philosophy article. In February 2016, this was true for 97% of all articles on Wikipedia, an increase from 94.52% in 2011. This also includes this article. The remaining articles lead to an article without any outgoing wikilinks, to pages that do not exist, or get stuck in loops.
File:Crawl on Wikipedia from random article to Philosophy..gif
File:Getting to Philosophy graph of Wikipedia articles by Pine.png
There have been some theories on this phenomenon, with the most prevalent being the tendency for Wikipedia pages to move up a "classification chain". According to this theory, the Wikipedia Manual of Style guidelines on how to write the lead section of an article recommend that articles begin by defining the topic of the article. A consequence of this style is that the first sentence of an article is almost always a definitional statement, a direct answer to the question "what is [the subject]?"
After [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Awareness&diff=prev&oldid=1217303609 an edit] to the Awareness article in April of 2024, among others switching the order of Philosophy and Psychology, the number of articles that lead to Philosophy this way has been greatly reduced, as Awareness and Psychology form a loop of their own. Since the edit, there had been numerous attempts to switch the order of the links leading to a discussion on the Awareness talk page.{{Citation |title=Awareness talk page |date= |work= |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Awareness&oldid=1231519075 |access-date=June 29, 2024 |language=}} However, now, the order has been reverted back so philosophy remains first. Additionally, on the page for [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction Abstraction], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abstraction&diff=prev&oldid=1184545900 an edit] was made, changing the order of concepts and rules. This reduced the number of pages that reached Philosophy, through abstraction, as Concepts and Abstraction formed their own loop.
Method summarized
Following the chain consists of:
- Clicking on the first non-parenthesized, non-italicized link within the article body.
- * Italics (or hatnotes) would cause uninteresting loops such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Trade_Organization&oldid=1192582034 World Trade Organization] linking to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WTO_(disambiguation)&oldid=950937702 WTO (disambiguation)] which links back to World Trade Organization
- * Parentheses would pick up language links that quickly railroad the subject, such as Txorierri line linking to Basque language instead of Narrow-gauge railway
- * Infobox links should be ignored, with the first infobox link (if applicable) generally being dictated by the structure of the infobox rather than the choices actively made by the authors of the article.
- Ignoring external links or red links (links to non-existent pages)
- Stopping when reaching "Philosophy", or a page with no links, or when a loop occurs
Mathematician Hannah Fry demonstrated the method in the 'Marmalade', 'socks' and 'One Direction' section of the 2016 BBC documentary The Joy of Data.
Origins
See also
References
{{reflist|refs=
{{cite book |title=Evaluating and Improving Navigability of Wikipedia: A Comparative Study of Eight Language Editions |author-first1=Daniel |author-last1=Lamprecht |author-first2=Dimitar |author-last2=Dimitrov |author-first3=Denis |author-last3=Helic |author-first4=Markus |author-last4=Strohmaier |publisher=Association for Computing Machinery |date=2016-08-17 |location=OpenSym, Berlin, Germany |isbn=978-1-4503-4451-7 |doi=10.1145/2957792.2957813 |url=http://www.daniellamprecht.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Evaluating-and-Improving-Navigability-of-Wikipedia-a-Comparative-Study-of-eight-Language-Editions.pdf |access-date=2021-03-17 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230904213930/https://www.daniellamprecht.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Evaluating-and-Improving-Navigability-of-Wikipedia-a-Comparative-Study-of-eight-Language-Editions.pdf |archive-date=2023-09-04}}
{{cite web | url=http://www.xefer.com/wikipedia | title=Xefer Wikipedia Radial Graph }}
The page Philosophy loops back to itself via the twelve-article chain of Existence, Reality, Universe, Space, Three-dimensional space, Geometry, Mathematics, Theory, Reason, Consciousness, Awareness, Philosophy.
}}
External links
- [http://www.xefer.com/wikipedia A web page] that renders links graphically in a tree (detects loops and uses the second link to always complete the process)
- [https://github.com/hay/wikilope Wikilope] is a command line utility and Node.js library that can do various queries on Wikipedia pages, including the get to "Philosophy" effect.
- [https://www.npmjs.com/package/getting-to-philosophy Getting to Philosophy], a Node.js library that allows to query any Wikipedia page and get the different pages names that will get to "Philosophy" (also avoids loops and use the second link)
- [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vehDe2lSptU A YouTube video] demonstrating this observation, which starts with a random article and eventually ends up in the article Philosophy
- [http://matpalm.com/blog/2011/08/13/wikipedia-philosophy/ Analysis] showing that over 95% of Wikipedia articles get to Philosophy
- The alt-text of a [http://xkcd.com/903/ webcomic] at xkcd notes this phenomenon (see tooltip)
- {{cite web |title=Wikipedia's fixed point |date=2011-05-26 |author-first=Bob |author-last=West |author-link=:d:Q28053587 |work=dlab @ EPFL |publisher=Data Science Lab, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne |publication-place=Lausanne, Switzerland |url=https://dlab.epfl.ch/2011-05-26-wikipedias-fixed-point/ |access-date=2023-09-04 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220523101801/https://dlab.epfl.ch/2011-05-26-wikipedias-fixed-point/ |archive-date=2022-05-23}}
- [https://github.com/seangransee/WikiLoopr WikiLoopr], a tool designed to find loops when following the first link in articles.
- {{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jul/10/only-way-essex-wikipedia-philosophy |title=The Only Way Is Essex + Wikipedia = philosophy |work=The Guardian}}
- {{cite news |author-first=Amy |author-last=Lee |title=All Wikipedia Ends In Philosophy, Literally |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wikipedia-philosophy_n_1093460 |date=2011-11-14 |work=The Huffington Post|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402212608/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wikipedia-philosophy_n_1093460 |archive-date=2 April 2019 }}
- [https://docs.google.com/document/d/10hSeyZhXOfMiTPrVYX0WrhmTXnmzGrU11C8LAPYyZN4/edit?usp=sharing/ Wikipedia Pages That Don't Lead to Philosophy] an in-progress (unfinished) database of Wikipedia page loops that result in a page not leading to philosophy.
- [https://www.sixdegreesofwikipedia.com Six Degrees of Wikipedia], an interactive tool to find paths between articles.
- [https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.05368 Cultural Structures of Knowledge from Wikipedia Networks of First Links], a study that looks at how this phenomenon varies across languages.
- [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-llumS2rA8I A video essay] about "The Philosophy Game" and how [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Awareness&diff=prev&oldid=1217303609 an edit] to Awareness broke it.