Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/2013–14 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/1
=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/2013–14 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/1|2013–14 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team]]=
: {{al|2013–14 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team|noname=yes}} • • Most recent review
: {{#ifeq:Wikipedia|Wikipedia||{{error:not substituted|GAR/result}} {{error|It should only be used for closing community reassessments.}}
}} Result: No consensus for promotion. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 03:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Having previously brought 2008–09 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, 2009–10 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, 2010–11 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, 2011–12 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team, and 2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team through the WP:GAN process, I am a bit surprised at the amount of difficulty I have had with the 2013–14 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team nomination. The reviewer {{u|Biblioworm}} seems to be a novice reviewer or at least unfamiliar with reviews in this subject area. He initially [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2013%E2%80%9314_Michigan_Wolverines_men%27s_basketball_team/GA1&diff=632198944&oldid=631955065 failed] the nomination, but after {{u|TheQ Editor}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2013%E2%80%9314_Michigan_Wolverines_men%27s_basketball_team&diff=632218938&oldid=632199744 prompted him to put the article on hold] he did. After I addressed a long list of concerns, he [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2013%E2%80%9314_Michigan_Wolverines_men%27s_basketball_team/GA1&diff=632642483&oldid=632561789 added several more and stated that he sought a 2nd opinion]. After 3 weeks of waiting for a 2nd opinion that never came, he [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2013%E2%80%9314_Michigan_Wolverines_men%27s_basketball_team/GA1&diff=635795861&oldid=632788146 failed the nomination]. After his second decision to fail the article another editor ({{u|Ritchie333}}) chimed in that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2013%E2%80%9314_Michigan_Wolverines_men%27s_basketball_team&diff=637057496&oldid=635956301 he should have been more patient in regards to the 2nd opinion]. On December 8, Biblioworm mentioned that he would [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2013%E2%80%9314_Michigan_Wolverines_men%27s_basketball_team&diff=637180335&oldid=637135576 hunt down an experienced GAN reviewer], but he hasn't. Both outside editors (TheQ Editor and Ritchie333) gave unsolicited opinions that the fail was a bit rash. I have had hundreds of GA nominations pass and dozens fail. I have never had two unsolicited opinions that a failed nomination was rash. As a result, I am seeking a community assessment of whether the fail was a rash decision.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
:Excuse me, but I have asked for a second opinion from an experienced reviewer here. --Biblioworm 15:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
::Thank you. I have left a note there pointing here. P.S. I didn't mean that you hadn't tried to hunt down one, you just have not actually hunted one down yet.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- N.B. the page has received a visit from the WP:GOCE member {{u|Miniapolis}}, which has resulted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2013%E2%80%9314_Michigan_Wolverines_men%27s_basketball_team&diff=643784760&oldid=639232513 this significant change].--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)