Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/David Archuleta/1

= [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/David Archuleta/1|David Archuleta]] =

: {{al|David Archuleta|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/David_Archuleta/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]Most recent review

: {{GAR/current}}

This article has been at GA status for over 16 years and hasn't been reassessed since. There are a some issues that should be looked at if this article is to remain at GA status.

I brought these up at the talk page a week ago but I don't think anyone is watching.

Some issues I noticed:

  • The latter section of the Career section is very poor. Most of the more recent stuff (last 10 years) reads as a WP:PROSELINE list of chronological events that has been assembled piecemeal instead of written as proper prose. (WP:GACR6 #1)
  • Some of the paragraphs are very short - some only two short sentences long. These should probably be restructured to be more substantial. (WP:GACR6 #1)
  • There are a few citation needed tags (and other tags) interspersed throughout the article, once again mostly in the latter part of the article. (WP:GACR6 #2)
  • Not particularly a GA issue, but in general the citations in the lead & in the infobox should be moved into the body of the article (MOS:INFOBOXCITE, MOS:LEADCITE)
  • It doesn't look like there are any citations at all for the Performances table (WP:GACR6 #2)
  • The Filmography section is also missing many citations. (WP:GACR6 #2)

RachelTensions (talk) 00:51, 20 March 2025 (UTC)