Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Forbidden City/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Forbidden City/1|Forbidden City]]=

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Forbidden City|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Forbidden_City/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Forbidden City/1|Category:GAR/77}} Result: No improvement Real4jyy (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

A 2007 GA that seems worse for the wear. It has various uncited claims, a general overabundance of images that creates sandwiching issues across much of the article. The history section is written in a summary style when it really doesn't have to be - it has plenty of room to grow. And some of the sourcing is to things such as travel guides or fun facts lists. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}