Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Georgia Tech/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Georgia Tech/1|Georgia Tech]]=

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Georgia Tech|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Georgia_Tech/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Georgia Tech/1|Category:GAR/71}} Result: It has been more than a week, and the outlying issues still remain. Unfortunately, that means that we cannot, in good faith, continue to declare this to meet a standard that it no longer does. That being said, I will be boldly closing this discussion. Bneu2013 (talk) 18:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

I am nominating this article for GA reassessment. It has been sixteen years since this was promoted, and a lot of issues have accumulated since then. The biggest is a lack of adequate citations, which would be an automatic fail in a GA nomination. There are two {{more citations needed}} tags, one of which has been there since 2010, and has somehow flown under the radar since then. Bneu2013 (talk) 21:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

{{abot}}