Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Geyser/1
=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Geyser/1|Geyser]]=
{{atopg}}
: {{al|Geyser|noname=yes}} • • GAN review not found
: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Geyser/1|Category:GAR/80}} Result: Kept. charlotte 👸♥ 19:06, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
There are uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. There is also a "better sources needed" banner from November 2023. Z1720 (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
:Fixed the "better sources needed" issue by finding reliable sources. Which paragraphs are uncited? Paragraphs in the lede that summarize the article may not need citations, per WP:CITELEAD. — hike395 (talk) 19:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
::{{re|Hike395}} I have added cn tags to the article where they are missing. Z1720 (talk) 20:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Z1720}} I fixed all of the {{tl|cn}} tags, removed material I could not source, replaced unreliable sources, and cleaned up the references in general. The article looks GA to me at this point: what do you think? — hike395 (talk) 10:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
::::(not Z1720) @Hike395, good work on this. § Valley of Geysers, Russia has a [quantify] tag which should be fixed before this is kept, and several of the citations in the references section aren't used (you can see which with User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors), which should be moved to a further reading section or removed. Thanks, {{please ping}} charlotte 👸♥ 05:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Queen of Hearts}} {{Done}} — hike395 (talk) 12:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
::::::Keep charlotte 👸♥ 17:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
{{outdent}}Keep, citation concerns resolved, better sources needed banner resolved. Z1720 (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}