Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Johann Mickl/1
=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Johann Mickl/1|Johann Mickl]]=
: {{al|Johann Mickl|noname=yes}} • • Most recent review
: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Johann Mickl/1|
}} Result: delisted Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
The article fails criterion #2b "all in-line citations are from reliable sources". The article is mainly based upon two sources by:
- Richter, Heinz; Kobe, Gerd (1983). Bei den Gewehren—General Johann Mickl—Ein Soldatenschicksal [With the Guns—General Johann Mickl—A Soldiers Fate] (in German). Bad Radkersburg, Austria: Selbstverlag der Stadt Bad Radkersburg;
- Schraml, Franz (1962). Kriegsschauplatz Kroatien die deutsch-kroatischen Legions-Divisionen: 369., 373., 392. Inf.-Div. (kroat.) ihre Ausbildungs- und Ersatzformationen [The Croatian Theatre of War: German-Croatian Legion divisions: the 369th, 373rd and 392nd (Croatian) Infantry Divisions and their Training and Replacement Units] (in German). Neckargemünd, Germany: K. Vowinckel.
According to this review of the sources, the article also fails criterion #4 as being non-neutral MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:50, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delist: does not meet the current GA requirements for sourcing and neutrality. The review of the sources offered by {{U|Assayer}} is thorough and compelling: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Johann_Mickl&oldid=885479625#POV_issues_because_of_unreliable_sources POV issues because of unreliable sources]. --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:48, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delist per above... Eddie891 Talk Work 15:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- comment. Unlike Coffman I find Assayers arguments far from compelling. Presumptions are made about reliability, peer reviews and the manner of publishing. That said, the style isn't appropriate; it should be rewritten because this appears too often in the article. Dapi89 (talk)
- Delist. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 17:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)