Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ling Woo/1

: {{al|Ling Woo|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Ling_Woo/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:Wikipedia|Wikipedia||{{error:not substituted|GAR/result}} {{error|It should only be used for closing community reassessments.}}}}{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Ling Woo/1|Category:GAR/56}} Result: kept I know I initiated this reassessment, but considering no one else has voiced an opinion in two months I am going to boldly keep it. This can be considered a no consensus to delist close or a withdrawn by nominator close. AIRcorn (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Two large tags on this article which relate to the criteria (prose and neutrality). The tone is the main issue, it reads too much like an essay and too much is written in Wikipedias voice. AIRcorn (talk) 01:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

• Comment, it apepars that the tags were placed there by User:TEHodson, and that users concerns can be found on the talk page. There does not appear to be a consensus as to whether the concerns are valid or not. That being said the article content which TEHodson is concerned about is verified to reliable sources, and thus the content is justified. That being said, the article content appears to be relatively stable, and I would weak oppose the unlisting of this article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)