Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mount Vesuvius/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mount Vesuvius/1|Mount Vesuvius]]=

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Mount Vesuvius|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Mount_Vesuvius/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Mount Vesuvius/1|Category:GAR/71}} Result: Delisting per consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

GA from 2006. Numerous uncited material in sections such as the Formation, Casualties, Later Eruptions, National Park, and more amongst other problems. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

  • Delist: The article is in bad shape. Here's an example: an entire subsection that cites no sources. Hardly fit of a Good Article. Festucalextalk 17:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Delist. Concur. Ifly6 (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

{{abot}}