Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency/1

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Multilateral_Investment_Guarantee_Agency/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency/1|Category:GAR/67}} Result: Delisted. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

There is a maintenance template at the top of the article that says that the article contains self-published sources. Because of this, I believe that the article could no longer remain a good article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

:Delist With 14 of 24 references coming from the MIGA or the World Bank Group there is too high a ratio of use of primary sources with some paragraphs only supported by primary sources.Gusfriend (talk) 05:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delist - uncited text, overuse of non-independent referencing, a gap of any events between 2010 and 2019, and major WP:PROSELINE issues in places. Hog Farm _Talk 03:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

{{abot}}