Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Objections to evolution/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Objections to evolution/1|Objections to evolution]]=

: {{al|Objections to evolution|noname=yes}} • [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Objections_to_evolution/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:Wikipedia|Wikipedia||{{error:not substituted|GAR/result}} {{error|It should only be used for closing community reassessments.}}}}{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Objections to evolution/1|Category:GAR/48}} Result: No action. Nomination by editor involved in content disagreement. Please resolve the differences first. Thanks, Geometry guy 14:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I think there is still to much controversy and bias in this article for it to be included as a good article. The editors are currently trying to resolve their differences, but pending reconciliation, this article needs to be purged from the good article list...--Gniniv (talk) 07:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)