Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/PHP/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/PHP/1|PHP]]=

{{atopr}}

: {{al|PHP|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/PHP/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • GAN review not found

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/PHP/1|Category:GAR/75}} Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 22:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Multiple issues. The article is peppered with {{tl|cn}} tags, and is largely based on primary sources (with not enough weight being given to third party sources). There is a one line section covering the PHP Foundation which should probably eithier be integrated into "History" (or removed completely). Additionally there are multiple dubious statements and promotional SEAOFBLUEs in the "Use" section while the "Security" section offers uncited WP:NOTGUIDE advice on security matters Sohom (talk) 08:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}