Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pennsylvania Turnpike/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pennsylvania Turnpike/1|Pennsylvania Turnpike]]=

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Pennsylvania Turnpike|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Pennsylvania_Turnpike/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Pennsylvania Turnpike/1|Category:GAR/80}} Result: Delisted. Charlotte (Queen of Heartstalk) 18:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Article has gotten out of hand since 2012 promotion.

  • WP:TOOBIG concerns, article is 227,901 bytes and needs some trimming.
  • Lots of cases where several sentences in a row begin with "In (year), blah blah happened." over and over, so a copy edit is needed.
  • "Service Plaza" sub-header has several one-sentence paragraphs and excessive detail, along with more cases of several sentences in a row beginning with "In (year)".
  • Had an "in popular culture" section of trivial tangential name-drops, which I snipped out.
  • External links seem excessive.
  • PA Highways site tagged as unreliable self-published source.

Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

:How else are you supposed to write a history section for a road article? They typically announce things at a specific date, even if they had planned to do it a long time before. Same with the service plaza section. Cfeddse (talk) 03:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

::You vary the sentence structure and length. When literally every sentence begins with "In (year)..." it's boring and clunky and doesn't flow well. It's a basic rule of writing. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}