Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Restless (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)/1

{{atopg}}

: {{al|Restless (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)|noname=yes}} • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Restless_(Buffy_the_Vampire_Slayer)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review

: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Restless (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)/1|Category:GAR/84}} Result: Kept. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Uncited information in the article, including several very large paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 02:33, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

::Could you please point to which exact portions need to be sourced? There was some uncited content added to the analysis section back in 2020, which seems to be the only major (uncited) additions to the article since the GA promotion. Drovethrughosts (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

:::{{re|Drovethrughosts}} I have added citation needed tags. Some of the information in the Background section is in-universe, which might be better placed in the "Plot" section. Z1720 (talk) 03:16, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

• Z1720, while I am unsure the explanation of the writer and director is Analysis (it is a description of intentions), but the tags appear resolved. CMD (talk) 11:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
• Keep I think the "Background" section needs a major trim to remove unnecessary information, and there are some short paragraphs that could be better formatted, but overall this is fine enough to keep. Z1720 (talk) 00:11, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

{{abot}}