Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Whitwell, Isle of Wight/1
=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Whitwell, Isle of Wight/1|Whitwell, Isle of Wight]]=
{{atopr}}
: {{al|Whitwell, Isle of Wight|noname=yes}} • • Most recent review
: {{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Whitwell, Isle of Wight/1|Category:GAR/83}} Result: Delisted. Real4jyy (talk) 05:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
There are lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The "History" section has no information after 2009. The article is missing information about its climate, which is typical in city/village articles. Z1720 (talk) 16:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
:Delist, with the proviso that I don't think the lack of a climate section is a showstopper: the GA criteria only need the "major aspects" of the topic to be covered, unlike the FA standards, which require comprehensiveness. I think it's entirely possible to cover the major bases on a UK town without a whole section saying that the place is grey and wet. UndercoverClassicist T·C 15:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
{{abot}}