Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Yuna (Final Fantasy)/1

=[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Yuna (Final Fantasy)/1|Yuna (Final Fantasy)]]=

: Article ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yuna_%28Final_Fantasy%29&action=edit Edit] · [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yuna_%28Final_Fantasy%29&action=history History]) · Article talk ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yuna_%28Final_Fantasy%29&action=edit Edit] · [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yuna_%28Final_Fantasy%29&action=history History]) · [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yuna_%28Final_Fantasy%29&action=watch Watch article] · [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Yuna_%28Final_Fantasy%29/&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]

: {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Wikipedia||{{error:not substituted|GAR/result}}}}Category:GAR/35 Result: Consensus achieved, article delisted. Malkinann (talk) 06:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The article does not meet the following criteria:

  • 1. Guidelines for lead sections and fiction (it is not written from an out of universe perspective).
  • 2. Some entire sections are unreferenced.
  • 3. A "Reception and criticism" section is missing.

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yuna_%28Final_Fantasy%29&oldid=58952507 Link to the article when it was promoted to GA]. Kariteh (talk) 09:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

:(Apologies for the delay in listing this at GAR. This is due to downtime at the toolserver. Geometry guy 21:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC))

  • Delist per nomination points #1 and #2. The lead is underdeveloped. The in-universe presentation is an obvious problem. And the "Final Fantasy X2" and "Other appearances" sections lack citations. Majoreditor (talk) 23:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delist Lead is way too short for this size of article. Lacks references. Ealdgyth | Talk 16:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delist per all the above. The plot-summmary type sections are on the over-long side too, and the external links need trimming. EyeSereneTALK 21:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delist Per above concerns (violation of WP:LEAD, GA broadness criterion and inadequate referencing. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ talk 23:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delist per above; too much plot, no lead, scope not fully explored. David Fuchs (talk) 19:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delist per above: poor lead, too much in universe. This discussion could be closed: could someone else try it, and give me some feedback on the process changes? Geometry guy 12:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)