Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 June 22
{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Special:Undelete| |{{#if:|
Web citation with a comment
When you want to set a reference with Template:Cite web and an additional comment (not a quote from the source) ... the only way is to write the comment outside of the template - there is no parameter for that purpose. Right? Is this the same situation for all like templates used for references? --KnightMove (talk) 11:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
:yes
:—Trappist the monk (talk) 11:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Help:Cite errors/Cite error ref no input
On the Death Grips Year of the Snitch album page, I removed a piece of text that was attached to a reference, however I cannot figure out how to remove the respective reference. The text deleted was referencing the album being leaked, when it all actuality the album was released in countries that are a day ahead of the United States, which caused internet users from the United States to rip the album from the respective countries' media platforms. The reference stands towards a statement made towards the end of that line, which was rather redundant, that said the album was released on multimedia platforms, which most mainstream artists do.
Once again, I'd like to know how to remove a reference from the page to increase its accuracy.
I appreciate it,
Hunter Johnson — Preceding unsigned comment added by H7Johnson (talk • contribs) 12:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
:{{u|H7Johnson}} Greetings to you. Content needs to supported by independent, reliable source. If the source did not indicated what the content claimed than the content should not be there, unless a new source that reflects the content would be replaced the formal. What you need to do is to removed the wrong reference and replace a new,correct one. Let us know if anything else we could help. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
:{{ec}}:{{ping|H7Johnson}} Your initial edit successfully removed the content AFAICT but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Year_of_the_Snitch&diff=prev&oldid=847030749 this edit] added extraneous ref tags which produced the error message. Now removed. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (
). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 13:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
False Information
A year a go, I worked with Wikipedia to correct a page that was written on me. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_D._Stevens#/editor/0
It when the final version was written it was agreed that the information reagarding the navy ratings changes would not be included because the information that was entered was incorrect. As such is it was deleted. Subsequently, today someone went back in and entered once again inaccurate information, base not on fact but hearsay media. I have gone in and deleated the information and would be grateful it remains as is. Thanks you, Mike Stevens 13th MCPON (ret) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 13thMCPON (talk • contribs) 14:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
:It should be back to the September version now, though I've tweaked "spearheaded" to "oversaw." --tronvillain (talk) 14:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
::Is there any particular reason you have registered yet another username? This is I think the third one you have used(never at the same time). 331dot (talk) 16:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
:The OP should note that there is never any such thing as a "final version" of a Wikipedia article.
:Firstly, unless temporarily (one hopes) protected (usually to prevent persistent vandalism), all articles can be edited by anyone, so there is always a possibility that a user will find incorrect information somewhere and, not realising it has previously been rejected, insert it in good faith. Further editing to remove it once more is just part of the neverending process.
:Secondly, any article must remain open to additions of further information, improvements in presentation, etc.
:Thirdly, allowing an "official" locked down version would potentially enable article subjects or their allies to present a sanitised account of themselves, rather than a comprehensive and neutral one.
:Incidentally, the subject of an article ought not to carry out edits to that article, but instead present edit requests, including specific wording changes and citations to published reliable sources, on the article's Talk page so that somone with no conflict of interest can assess the request and carry it out if it is judged appropriate. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.125.75.224 (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)