Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Automated Pain Recognition
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Automated Pain Recognition}}|}}
__NOINDEX__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
==[[:Draft:Automated Pain Recognition]]==
:{{pagelinks|Draft:Automated Pain Recognition}}
::{{grey|(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.)}} CoolSkittle (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Synthesis of published material, move (transwiki import) to Wikiversity 94rain Talk 06:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- Can we do that for these WP:NOTJOURNAL articles? I have a bunch of these that I've had to reject, see Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not/Archive_56#Technical_research_papers_and_summaries_as_articles AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:36, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, leave it to the standard AfC processing, which includes the six month delay before deleting if the author cannot overcome the indicated problems. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- The author says on the talk page that: As "Automated Pain Recognition" is a very young scientific field, not much secondary sources exist.".--94rain Talk 07:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}