Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rouge admin   (4th nomination)

One of the many of reasons why Wikipedia is seen as a geek orgy. Law Lord (talk) 10:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

• Keep it's harmless and a humerous page in Wikispace. Not really one of the reasons why Wikipedia is seen as a geek orgy..... Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 10:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Is a small part of wikipedia's culture and history. Self-reflective humour is a learning tool, and should be encouraged. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per above. I am not that fond of it, but it is part of the history and culture of wikipedia. --Bduke (Discussion) 11:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
• Keep a little humor never hurt anyone, especially not when poking fun at those who can vent better than they can spell. Jclemens (talk) 14:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
• Delete any user who even thinks about deleting this. (It's funny, laugh.) Jonathunder (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
• Keep If you can find it yet you disapprove, you're probably just bitter about not getting invited to geek orgies. John Nevard (talk) 15:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

:Not really, but I have heard you are a great host at those. --Law Lord (talk) 15:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Unless we intend to delete all Cabal Approved Material. Which would be a great idea (Redacted by the Cabal)--Tznkai (talk) 17:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Whenever I think I am being victimised by admins, I turn to this page for confirmation. Abtract (talk) 19:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.