Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Phoenix Wright

A limited scope (8 articles) project that looks to have been abandoned before it was ever finished. There are [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Phoenix_Wright&action=history 5 edits], one of which is tagging with mfd template. There do not seem to be any active members. But if membership increase and they do choose to collaborate, then their efforts might be more effective as a WP:VG task force. The project's creator, User:Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza, has also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARaiku_Lucifer_Samiyaza&diff=277699871&oldid=277129620 been notified]. -- (Guyinblack25 ^talk 19:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC))

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Guyinblack25 ^talk 19:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, or transmogrify into a task force if the creator (and others, no point having a task force of one) are still interested. –xeno (talk) 19:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• Keep This project is only about a month old, give the creator a chance to do something with it. If they cannot get the participants to sign up then give it the chop. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• I agree start ups should be given time to develop, but the project page has been virtually untouched since it's creation. The talk page has yet to be created and the user began working on TV series soon after. I'm not faulting them for creating it, but if it's not going to be used then there's no reason to keep the page. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 20:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC))
• KEEP i'm waiting for people to join. Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 21:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• I've cleaned it up. Raiku Lucifer Samiyaza 21:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Another point. If this is kept it should be changed to Wikipedia:WikiProject Ace Attorney since the main article was changed to that from Phoenix Wright (series) to that some time ago. The reason being is that the fourt game included a new main character. The fourt game of the series does not include phoenix Wright in the title and it is highly unlikely that the new spinoff game staring Miles Edgeworth will either. In short Ace Attorney is more conesitant because it covers the seires better than Phoenix Wright. --76.66.181.224 (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. Rather small set of articles for a whole project. Don't have any opposition to a task force should the creator be able to gather more members. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 04:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
• Make taskforce of Nintendo or VG project. Stifle (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
• Nintendo has already itself been taskforcified, so it would have be a subtaskforce. –xeno (talk) 20:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
• Only one of its games were published by Nintendo of Australia, so I don't think the whole topic would readily fall under the scope of the Nintendo task force (remember that it is a product of Capcom). I don't see much a problem of making it a task force of WPVG, however. MuZemike 00:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• Agreeded, the Nintendo Taks Force only applies to first and second party games. IMO one game being published by Nintendo of Austrialia and none of the other branches is not enough. --76.66.182.34 (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• The scope is clearly in the range only for taskforce material. No need for the expense of a WIkiproject. --MASEM (t) 20:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
• Move to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Ace Attorney as a task force per my recommendation above. MuZemike 07:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per belief that the topic is not large enough to support task force or wikiproject. --Der Wohltempierte Fuchs ^(talk) 12:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.