Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations

{{inactive}}

{{Motd nav}}

{{Notice|Before nominating a motto or adding your comments to a current nomination, please read through the list of frequently used ideas and the list of scheduled mottos to avoid the duplication of a previously approved motto. You may also run a Google search similar to this search for "Example motto". If nominating a new motto, please be sure it meets the criteria listed below.}}

{{Shortcut|WP:MOTD/N}}

{{archive box

|collapsible = yes

|search=yes

|

  1. 25 May 2006 — 19 Dec 2006
  2. 20 Dec 2006 — 31 Dec 2006
  3. 01 Jan 2007 — 13 Feb 2007
  4. 14 Feb 2007 — 07 Apr 2007
  5. 08 Apr 2007 — 06 May 2007
  6. 07 May 2007 — 17 Jun 2007
  7. 18 Jun 2007 — 04 Mar 2008
  8. 05 Mar 2008 — June 2008
  9. 2007–2008 others with backlog
  10. 2007–2008 same as above
  11. July 2008 – Sept 2008
  12. Sept 2008
  13. Sept 2008 – Oct 2008
  14. Oct 2008
  15. Oct 2008 – Dec 2008 + specials
  16. Dec 2008 – Jan 2009
  17. Jan 2009
  18. Jan 2009 – Feb 2009
  19. Feb 2009 – Mar 2009
  20. Mar 2009 – May 2009
  21. May 2009 – June 2009
  22. July 2009 – Aug 2009
  23. Aug 2009 – Sept 2009
  24. Oct 2009 – Nov 2009
  25. Dec 2009 – Jan 2010 + specials
  26. Feb 2010 – Mar 2010
  27. Apr 2010
  28. May 2010 – June 2010 + specials
  29. June 2010 + specials
  30. July 2010
  31. Aug 2010
  32. Sept 2010
  33. Oct 2010 – Dec 2010 + specials
  34. Jan 2011 – Mar 2011 + specials
  35. Mar 2011 – Apr 2011 + specials
  36. May 2011
  37. June 2011 + specials
  38. July 2011 – Aug 2011
  39. Sept 2011 – Oct 2011
  40. Nov 2011 – Dec 2011 + specials
  41. Jan 2011 – Feb 2012 + specials
  42. Mar 2012
  43. Apr 2012 – May 2012 + specials
  44. June 2012 – July 2012 + specials
  45. August 2012
  46. Sep 2012 – Oct 2012 + specials
  47. Nov 2012 – Dec 2012 + specials
  48. Jan 2013 – Mar 2013 + specials
  49. Apr 2013 – Jun 2013 + specials
  50. Jul 2013 – Dec 2013 + specials
  51. Jan 2014 – May 2014 + specials
  52. Jun 2014 – Sep 2014
  53. Oct 2014 – Dec 2014 + specials

}}

Motto criteria

= Your motto should: =

  • Reflect the community or purpose of Wikipedia.
  • Be short; it's a motto, not an essay.
  • Be funny or serious; but nevertheless, interesting.
  • Be powerful; it should provoke a reaction or draw attention, not just another "blah blah".

= Your motto should ''not'': =

  • Be similar to another approved motto.
  • Be offensive or inflammatory.
  • Be too obscure (so no little-known Yoda quotes, please).
  • Contain redundant links (e.g. We want you! …to join Wikipedia., where the meaning is clear without the links).

Tip: avoid rarely used words that not everyone will understand. Remember, a lot of non-English speakers read Wikipedia.

Nomination procedure

To nominate a motto for review, simply add it at the top of the In review section using this format:

= Example motto =

Origin of the motto and your comments. ~~~~

  • First comment goes here. ~~~~
  • :Any replies get indented again. ~~~~

== Edit 1 of Example motto ==

Edit 1. Reason for edit, what was changed, etc. ~~~~

  • Anyone can comment on a nomination. Simply type Support or Oppose (Support or Oppose), and, if possible, leave a reason. Remember to always sign your posts on discussion pages. However, it is generally frowned upon if you vote twice in one motto so please stick to one, although multiple comments are allowed.
  • Please do not support yourself.
  • Please note that this page uses the bulleted !voting style, the same as on Featured picture candidates (see below).
  • If you find a motto that is the same or similar to a previously nominated motto, please leave a comment on the new nomination that links to the old nomination, so that others will be able to compare the two.
  • Simple spelling mistakes or punctuation errors may be corrected without creating a new edit; just be sure to leave a comment explaining exactly what you have changed. If you have an idea that might improve a motto by rewording, changing the links, etc., nest a new heading (see the above example) under the motto.
  • After 14 days, it’s decision time—the motto should be moved to the top of the decision section. Anyone in the discussion is welcome to judge the consensus to either accept, reject, or reopen a motto. See below for the procedure on how to do this. Also please note that determining consensus should not be just based on counting votes.

Remember, new nominations for mottos go AT THE TOP of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Motto_of_the_day/Nominations/In_review&action=edit In review] section

=Reusing a motto=

Sometimes you may think of an idea and then find it has already been suggested a while ago. It is possible to reuse a motto that has been suggested in the past. However, there are some provisos:

  • If the motto has been declined in the past nomination, this means it can be reused at any time.
  • If the motto has been approved in the past nomination, so long as a year has passed since its nomination and it also has different links it can be reused.
  • If a motto has been nominated and approved many times in the past it should be added to WP:Motto of the day/Nominations/Frequently used ideas. These mottoes are generally frowned upon unless a long time has passed.

Please check the archives and search for your motto or variation to check its status before nominating

=How to comment for nominations=

  • Write Support, if you approve of the nomination. A reason is optional.
  • Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the nomination. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the nomination.
  • You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
  • To change your opinion, strike it out (with ...) rather than removing it.
  • If you think a nominated motto obviously fails the general criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.

:Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.

__TOC__

{{/In review}}