Wikipedia:Peer review/Manchester United F.C./archive3

:Previous peer review

:{{PR/header|Manchester United F.C.| Wikipedia:Peer review/Manchester United F.C./archive3|December 2008}}

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for December 2008. Category:Peer review pages with semiautomated peer reviews

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Category:January 2009 peer reviews

I've listed this article for peer review because I am quite confident that, with a little bit of work, this article isn't far away from Featured Article status. I'm fairly sure that most of the article is up to scratch, and I'm well aware that the History section needs a fair bit of referencing, so I'm really looking for comments about the quality of the prose rather than about the feeble referencing.

Many thanks, – PeeJay 21:10, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

• Comment. PJ, per the AutoPR, regarding captioning consistency, I'm thinking there should be periods at the end of every caption, regardless of whether or not it's a "complete" sentence. Calebrw (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
• I disagree. If it's a sentence fragment or a phrase, there is no need to put a full stop (that's what we call "periods" over here) at the end of the caption. – PeeJay 19:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)