Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 24#File:Kursky new building.jpg

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

File was uploaded on 22 July 2009, with author claiming own work. Exact dimension copy (with color balance slightly different) was posted at [http://beautycontests.blogspot.com/2009/07/road-to-miss-universe-2009-latin.html a blog about beauty contests] on 21 July 2009, one day earlier. Strongly suspect copyright violation. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:Delete it. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

No evidence at source - http://cva.moreheadstate.edu/phototour.php?ph_id=1957&ch=1 - that the image has been released into the public domain B (talk) 17:20, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Seal of the Alabama House of Representatives. No evidence of PD release. It is possible that it is PD by virtue of its age or by Alabama law, but either would need to be substantiated. B (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Seal of the Alabama state Senate. No evidence of PD release. It is possible that it is PD by virtue of its age or by Alabama law, but either would need to be substantiated. B (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The source website claims copyright, no evidence that works of the North Dakota government are PD B (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The legislation cited that claims this image is PD says that "public information" is PD. "Public information" means things like laws, court rulings, schedules, public documents, etc. A photo is not "public information". B (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Source website claims copyright, no evidence that works of the Oregon state government are PD B (talk) 17:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Based on image resolution, lack of camera metadata, and uploader's history of copyright problems, I doubt that this is free. Even if it is, it is stretched at such an angle that it doesn't really make sense to use, IMO. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

No evidence of this license on the source website B (talk) 17:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Source website claims copyright, no evidence that works of the Rhode Island government are PD B (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Source website claims copyright, no evidence that works of the Rhode Island government are PD B (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

No evidence that works of the Washington (state) government are public domain B (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

No evidence that works of the Washington (state) government are public domain B (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

No evidence that works of the state of Vermont are PD and even if they were, they source this image to "Marie Charbonneau" and there is no evidence that she has released it into the PD. B (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

No evidence that works of the Vermont state government are PD B (talk) 17:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

No evidence on source website to support license B (talk) 17:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Source website claims copyright, no evidence of license B (talk) 17:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Source website gives no indication of license B (talk) 17:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Source website claims copyright, no indication works of Massachusetts gov't are PD B (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

1938 photo originally from the San Diego Union-Tribune. Possibly PD if the copyright was not renewed, but there's no reason to believe that to be the case. B (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

1935 photo of FDR. The source website does not give the identity of the photographer. It's possible that it is PD as either a work for which the copyright was not renewed or a work of the federal government, but there is no evidence given to make such a conclusion. B (talk) 18:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

"Circa 1923-1927" is not "before January 1, 1923". It's possible that this image is PD as one that was published without a copyright notice or for which the copyright was not renewed, but there is not enough information to form such a conclusion B (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The source website gives no indication this image is PD. The photographer died in 1947, meaning if it is not already PD, it will not become PD until 2017. It may be PD by virtue of not having been registered or not having been renewed, but we have no way of knowing that from the information given. The image description page claims that there was no copyright renewal, but the source website makes no such claim and this user has countless copyvio uploads. B (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

No indication on the source website that this image is PD. It might be by virtue of the copyright not having been renewed, but there is no evidence of that. B (talk) 18:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a press photo. Low resolution, and the metadata has a unique image ID instead of the usual camera info. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Uploader has a ton of copyright issues in the past; this is another low-res image which doesn't have any metadata to support the claim that it's user-created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Uploader has a ton of copyright issues in the past; this is another low-res image which doesn't have any metadata to support the claim that it's user-created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Uploader has a ton of copyright issues in the past; this is another low-res image which doesn't have any metadata to support the claim that it's user-created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Photo of Michael Dukakis. Ridiculous licensing claim, but it's at least possible that this image is a PD government photo, so I'm listing it here rather than deleting it outright. B (talk) 21:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

• WP:NFC states as its first criterion for a non-free file: "No free equivalent. Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." This image keeps being used by the uploader to replace a free one on United_States_presidential_election,_1988 and Michael_Dukakis. Tough to argue there's no free equivalent when one is aggressively replacing a free equivalent. Hal (talk) 16:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Photo of Adlai Stevenson. Ridiculous licensing claim, but it's at least possible that this image is a PD government photo, so I'm listing it here rather than deleting it outright B (talk) 21:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Even though the pin itself is PD (published without a copyright notice), it is a 3D object (Mike Godwin says that coins are 3D enough for their photos to be copyrighted and this is more 3D than a coin) and so its photo is a creative work. The question is when the photo was taken and whether it was released under an acceptable license. B (talk) 22:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Photo of Al Smith from 1926. License claim is ridiculous, but the image may be PD for all of the obvious possible reasons. (This can't just be assumed, though - it needs to be proven.) B (talk) 22:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

• Unless better source and copyright info is verified, delete per nomination. Dubious license claim; no supporting evidence seen. Infrogmation (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Photo of Al Smith from 1928. It may be PD, but there's no evidence of that and it is a New York Times photo, so I would tend to doubt that. B (talk) 22:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The source link is dead, but the source website has a copyright notice. It's all in Russian so I wouldn't begin to know where to search for this particular image to see if it's still there and if they have any terms of use permitting this license. Based on this user's other uploads, I'm guessing that one is a no. B (talk) 22:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't read Russian, but from the Google translator version of their license - http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.otdihinfo.ru%2Fmenu%2Fabout%2F&sl=ru&tl=en&history_state0= - I don't see anything permitting redistribution or derivative works. If you want to use something from their website, you can, but that doesn't imply a right to modify or redistribute it virally. B (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't read Russian, but from the Google translator version of their license - http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.otdihinfo.ru%2Fmenu%2Fabout%2F&sl=ru&tl=en&history_state0= - I don't see anything permitting redistribution or derivative works. If you want to use something from their website, you can, but that doesn't imply a right to modify or redistribute it virally. B (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Source link is dead, but the source website bears a copyright notice. B (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Source link is dead, but the source website bears a copyright notice B (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Direct image link is dead, but the source website bears a copyright notice B (talk) 22:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Direct image link is dead, but the source website bears a copyright notice B (talk) 22:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.