Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 25#File:TweetyDoll.jpg

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|MBisanz}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

The file is from http://www.cyberport.hk/misc/cyberportmap/GIS_index.htm , where it says "Copyright © 2005 Hong Kong Cyberport Management Company Limited. All rights reserved." The uploader has uploaded this image (as well as its Chinese counterpart) several times to Commons previously, and claimed that he/she uploaded them on behalf of Cyberport, but never provided any concrete proof, even after being reminded several times. Moonian (talk) 04:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

I have just sent an email from my Cyberport email account to permissions-en@wikimedia.org proving that the map was indeed uploaded on behalf of Hong Kong Cyberport Management Company Limited. Please stop removing the map from Wikipedia. Krystalho (talk) 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by {{admin|Orphaned image deletion bot}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

{{archive top}}

Non-free logo of a football club. Uploader is releasing it into the public domain. User has history of copyright problems. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 06:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{tl|dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

::Another editor has changed/confirmed the fair-use of the image. I'm gonna close this. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 18:28, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

{{archive bottom}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Feydey}} AnomieBOT⚡ 13:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Screen shots from a TV show, being released by uploader under CC. This also goes for:

• :File:Yankee White Kate.jpg
• :File:Yankee White Tony.jpg
• :File:Yankee White Morrow.jpg
• :File:Yankee White Fornell.jpg
• :File:Yankee White Abby.jpg
• :File:Yankee White Ducky.jpg
• :File:Yankee White.jpg

User has [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Good_old_boy&oldid=306238761 history] of image problems. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 07:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 09:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Taken from website [http://www.vernacularmedia.org/index.php/Image:289.jpg], which appears to be another sort of wiki, but the image page there has no source information. Image page here purports to be "With permission from Carol Jordan, the author.", however rather than simply this assertion given by the image's uploader, would be best to have WP:OTRS confirmation of the image's licensing status, from the image's author and copyright holder themselves. Cirt (talk) 14:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:Okay, listen, I've not been active on Wikipedia for the last 2 years. The process I'd have to go through looks way too complicated and I certainly don't want to put Carol Jordan through it. What I have is (1) my request for permission and (2) the permission from the author, Carol Jordan. Copying below. — mark ✎ 14:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

; Mail to Carol Jordan (01 Jan 2009)

Dear Sir/Madam,

I'm a linguist working on African languages, writing on behalf of Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia. Some time ago I have written an article on the Nafaanra language for Wikipedia, and we are still looking for suitable pictures to include. The literacy class picture on the page http://www.vernacularmedia.org/index.php/Nafaanra_Literacy_Beginnings looks great, and I want to ask if it would be possible for us to use it to illustrate the Wikipedia article on Nafaanra: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nafaanra_language

; Reply from Carol Jordan (02 Feb 2009)

Dear Mark,

We loved what you have done with the Nafaanra entry. Only a couple of alterations to suggest.

First off, please feel free to include the picture(s) you have that might enhance the entry. If you want to run it by us to verify that it is indeed Nafaanra that would be OK.

(...)

Sincerely,

Carol and Dean Jordan

• Comment: Unfortunately, this permission is not sufficient. Please see commons:Commons:OTRS and commons:Commons:Email templates. Cirt (talk) 23:23, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

reason Krystalho (talk) 15:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

I have just sent an email from my Cyberport email account saying the map was uploaded on behalf of Hong Kong Cyberport Management Company Limited. Please stop removing the map from Wikipedia. Krystal Ho

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 05:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Professional-looking image, unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder Stifle (talk) 15:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 05:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a paparazzi photo rather than the uploader's own work; uploader has had other questionable uploads, but I can't isolate an original source for this particular image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 05:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Derivative work. Powers ^T 17:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

: Go ahead delete it. Kowloonese (talk) 05:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept; probably not eligible for copyright in the first place. Stifle (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

A camouflage pattern. It is an SVG traced from some random camouflage pattern on the internet. The source could be a PD-USGov source or it could be a private creative work - we have no way of knowing. B (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:It is certainly made by the government. It is a specific type of U.S. Military camouflage. Even if this wasn't the case, camouflage is hardly a "creative work". It is something that is strictly functional. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:30, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 05:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

No source info, watermark on the image --Admrboltz (talk) 23:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.