Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 May 12#File:1989 EC Champs.jpg

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Infrogmation}} AnomieBOT⚡ 15:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Artist's rendering of a planned stadium, most likely not created by the uploader. Mosmof (talk) 00:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

• Deleted, most or all of the user's uploads have been yoinked off the web with false claim of authorship and false licenses. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Infrogmation}} AnomieBOT⚡ 15:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Sourced to another website; very little detail (no link to direct page, etc.). Uploader has slight history of copyvios. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:17, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 23:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Source is [http://www.wikidominicana.edu.do/wiki/Imagen:SanPedro_Mun.jpg here], upload date there is much earlier than upload date here. No license data is given on that wiki. Unless some evidence can be found that they have some compatible license, this image should be deleted. Protonk (talk) 02:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Peripitus}} AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Collage, very likely not the work of the uploader. See recent AN/I thread for details. Protonk (talk) 02:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Quadell}} AnomieBOT⚡ 03:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Looks like a screencap from TV coverage. See AN/I thread for more info. Protonk (talk) 02:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

This, like many of the other images I am nominating concurrently, appears to be a publicity image, and it is doubtful that the uploader owns the copyright to the work, particularly as the uploader has been on Wikipedia for only seven days and has done nothing but edit the article depicting the person in the picture. Were I to guess, I'd say the uploader and the subject are probably one and the same. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Don't think the uploader owns this image. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a particularly obvious promotional image that is very doubtful to be owned by the uploader. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Another image that seems promotional and thus unlikely to be owned by the uploader. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Promotional image that I do not think is owned by the uploader. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

This image appears to be scanned from a newspaper or magazine, which would be the very definition of unfree content. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

This also appears to be scanned from print media. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Of all the images I am listing here concurrently, this one is probably the most likely to actually be free, but I feel it should be listed as well, because if I doubt the ownership of 10 images, I can't reasonably not doubt the eleventh. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

This one, as well, might be free, but I just am not sure enough. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

This image resembles a banner for a website. It is doubtful that the uploader owns it. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

This image appears to be scanned from a newspaper or magazine. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Another publicity image. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Moonriddengirl}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

File has been released in public domain but does not provide any information on creator Tomdobb (talk) 12:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

• I own this photo, it is from my high school. No one knows who took the picture as it is 34 years old. User:Lou72JG

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Quadell}} AnomieBOT⚡ 18:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Indicates public domain, no creator info, file has been deleted before Tomdobb (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

• I own this photo, it is from my high school. No one knows who took the picture as it is 58 years old. User:Lou72JG

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Indicates public domain, no creator info, file has been deleted before Tomdobb (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

• There is no copyright on this photo, it is from my high school. User:Lou72JG

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Indicates public domain, no creator info, file has been deleted before Tomdobb (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

• I own this photo, it is from my high school. No one knows who took the picture as it is 48 years old. User:Lou72JG

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Indicates public domain, no creator info, file has been deleted before Tomdobb (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

• I own this photo, it is from my high school. User:Lou72JG

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Luk}} A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

2-D piece of artwork, signed by the author with a date of '92. No proof image has been released in the manner the uploader claims. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

• Note that the uploader has now changed the licensing to "PD-self", which I also doubt. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
• I have replied today to an OTRS communication (Ticket:2009051710015187). Several issues need to be resolved before we can accept this licensing, but the matter may resolve soon if the writer is able to comply. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)