Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sgtposner.jpg

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Tito jackson.JPG}} ([{{fullurl:File:Tito jackson.JPG|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Tito jackson.JPG}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Tito jackson.JPG}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Tito jackson.JPG}}}}}} logs]).

• Low-res without metadata; uploader has history of misunderstanding copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: After what little answer I was able to get from the uploader, it appears that they have in their possession all of these photographs, but I was unable to confirm that they own the copyright to all of these photographs. Clearly a number of the photographs come from newspapers or other print media and one is a class photograph; I believe it is more likely that these photographs have been collected by the uploader rather than taken by the uploader and thus are not the uploader's to release. All files have been deleted. Shell ^babelfish 03:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• This photo belongs to me. I have the original & I'm the only one who uploaded this one.'''{{User:legwarmers1980| —Preceding unsigned comment added by Legwarmers1980 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

• Keep as a PD image Retag with whatever compatible tag the uploader wants or {{t1|PD-Pre1978}} if it was previously published (as the image does not have a copyright notice, it fails to comply with U.S. copyright law and lost its copyright years ago). — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

• Contacted uploader in the hopes that we can resolve this and the other images uploaded by the same person. Shell ^babelfish 08:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:SilverStar1945.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:SilverStar1945.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:SilverStar1945.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:SilverStar1945.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:SilverStar1945.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I'm the copyright owner. I have the original photo.Legwarmers1980 (talk)legwarmers1980 —Preceding undated comment added 02:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC).
• Keep See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Laponte-Bergman1.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Laponte-Bergman1.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Laponte-Bergman1.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Laponte-Bergman1.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Laponte-Bergman1.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Photo is an original. I own the original.Legwarmers1980 (talk) 02:29, 16 March 2010 (UTC)legwarmers1980
• Keep See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:VanDamme-Bergman79.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:VanDamme-Bergman79.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:VanDamme-Bergman79.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:VanDamme-Bergman79.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:VanDamme-Bergman79.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Norton-Bergman1975.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Norton-Bergman1975.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Norton-Bergman1975.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Norton-Bergman1975.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Norton-Bergman1975.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is a scan/picture taken from a magazine/newspaper/ect. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Original Photo. I own the original photo.Legwarmers1980 (talk)legwarmers1980. —Preceding undated comment added 02:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC).
• Keep See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Bergman2009.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Bergman2009.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Bergman2009.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Bergman2009.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Bergman2009.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is a scan/picture taken from a magazine/newspaper/ect. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I took this photo myself. I own the original copy. Legwarmers1980 (talk)legwarmers1980. —Preceding undated comment added 02:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC).
• Keep See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:Sgt.Bergman1944.jpg — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:JayW.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:JayW.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:JayW.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:JayW.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:JayW.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is a scan/picture taken from a sketch/magazine/newspaper of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep but tag as non free with actual source given. Pick one of the images on the page and add a FUR. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:JWJensen-Gangster.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:JWJensen-Gangster.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:JWJensen-Gangster.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:JWJensen-Gangster.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:JWJensen-Gangster.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is a scan/picture taken from a magazine/newspaper/ect. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep/Delete See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:JayW.jpg. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Jensen-RFS.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Jensen-RFS.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Jensen-RFS.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Jensen-RFS.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Jensen-RFS.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is a scan/picture taken from a magazine/newspaper/ect. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep/Delete See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:JayW.jpg. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Jensen-Paraiso.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Jensen-Paraiso.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Jensen-Paraiso.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Jensen-Paraiso.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Jensen-Paraiso.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is a scan/picture taken from a magazine/newspaper/ect. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep/Delete See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:JayW.jpg. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Jwjensen2001.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Jwjensen2001.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Jwjensen2001.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Jwjensen2001.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Jwjensen2001.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is a scan/picture taken from a magazine/newspaper/ect. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep/Delete See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_March_15#File:JayW.jpg. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:BigTrain1979.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:BigTrain1979.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:BigTrain1979.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:BigTrain1979.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:BigTrain1979.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I own original copy of this photo.Legwarmers1980 (talk)legwarmers1980. —Preceding undated comment added 02:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:CombatInfantryBadge.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:CombatInfantryBadge.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:CombatInfantryBadge.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:CombatInfantryBadge.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:CombatInfantryBadge.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I own the original photo & I uploaded it. Legwarmers1980 (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Sgtposner.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Sgtposner.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sgtposner.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Sgtposner.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Sgtposner.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Europe1945.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Europe1945.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Europe1945.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Europe1945.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Europe1945.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• This photo belongs to me & I'm the owner & I uploaded this photoLegwarmers1980 (talk) 01:19, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Bergman-rome.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Bergman-rome.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Bergman-rome.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Bergman-rome.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Bergman-rome.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I own the original photo & I uploaded it.Legwarmers1980 (talk) 02:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Shell Kinney}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Baltimorechamps34.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Baltimorechamps34.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Baltimorechamps34.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Baltimorechamps34.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Baltimorechamps34.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I own the original photo & I uploaded it.Legwarmers1980 (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Explicit}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Asantasiere.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Asantasiere.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Asantasiere.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Asantasiere.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Asantasiere.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is a scan/picture taken from a magazine/newspaper/ect. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Delete It's obvious this is scanned from a newspaper.--Effingcrazy (talk) 06:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|JzG}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Bergman-bluedevils.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Bergman-bluedevils.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Bergman-bluedevils.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Bergman-bluedevils.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Bergman-bluedevils.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I own the original photo & I uploaded it.Legwarmers1980 (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. As the one photo that the uploader confirmed they had taken themselves. Shell ^babelfish 03:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:RussiaUSA2009.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:RussiaUSA2009.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:RussiaUSA2009.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:RussiaUSA2009.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:RussiaUSA2009.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I took this photo in South Beach, FL on December 17, 2009.Legwarmers1980 (talk)legwarmers1980 —Preceding undated comment added 02:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Liz Smart.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Liz Smart.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Liz Smart.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Liz Smart.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Liz Smart.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Elizabeth Smart.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Elizabeth Smart.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Elizabeth Smart.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Elizabeth Smart.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Elizabeth Smart.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Sainu1.JPG}} ([{{fullurl:File:Sainu1.JPG|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sainu1.JPG}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Sainu1.JPG}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Sainu1.JPG}}}}}} logs]).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

• The image seems to be lifted from Sodabottle (talk) 07:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Steven Rudolph.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Steven Rudolph.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Steven Rudolph.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Steven Rudolph.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Steven Rudolph.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Synesthesia pizza computer.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Synesthesia pizza computer.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Synesthesia pizza computer.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Synesthesia pizza computer.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Synesthesia pizza computer.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Cropped from an advertisement of sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:MikeInezSeattle2010.JPG}} ([{{fullurl:File:MikeInezSeattle2010.JPG|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:MikeInezSeattle2010.JPG}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:MikeInezSeattle2010.JPG}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:MikeInezSeattle2010.JPG}}}}}} logs]).

• Promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Montage Atlanta2.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Montage Atlanta2.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Montage Atlanta2.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Montage Atlanta2.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Montage Atlanta2.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Eeekster (talk) 07:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Pascal.Tesson}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Cufc.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Cufc.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Cufc.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Cufc.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Cufc.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• File is a scan of a soccer club's badge. Copyright is owned by the club itself, not by the uploader. AussieLegend (talk) 08:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• I had assumed that the uploader had scanned this image himself, but it appears it's been taken directly from [http://www.isport.com.au/soccer/mqdsa/hgchome.cl?C=CHT the club's home page].[http://www.isport.com.au/soccer/mqdsa/logos/chtlogo.png?1208681171] I've now tagged it with a copyvio tag. --AussieLegend (talk) 08:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Image now tagged properly. Shell ^babelfish 08:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:HSF flag.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:HSF flag.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:HSF flag.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:HSF flag.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:HSF flag.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• If this is the flag of the Hazara Student Federation then it would be under copyright. something lame from CBW 08:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep retag as {{t1|pd-textlogo}} and {{t1|trademark}}. Chevrons, simple shapes and text cannot be copyrighted. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Shs soccer club.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Shs soccer club.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Shs soccer club.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Shs soccer club.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Shs soccer club.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Copyright would not be owned by Wikipedia editor but by school/team. something lame from CBW 08:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Delete not encyclopedic, copyrighted photo. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 21:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:L&OukCast2.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:L&OukCast2.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:L&OukCast2.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:L&OukCast2.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:L&OukCast2.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Licensed by the uploader under {{tl|PD-old}}, which is clearly incorrect as it's a cast photo for a 2010 program. AussieLegend (talk) 08:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:Delete, deliberately given a misleading copyright tag and the lack of source information from the uploader makes it impossible for anyone else to correct this. A similar image for the 2009 series has the correct information - as one cast image will suffice for the :Law & Order: UK article, there's no reason to keep this one. DrFrench (talk) 13:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Germán Villar.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Germán Villar.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Germán Villar.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Germán Villar.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Germán Villar.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• No description/date/location/author, belongs to a set of images on Villar's website http://www.germanvillar.com/ under "Portfolio" Hekerui (talk) 11:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Vinda.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Vinda.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Vinda.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Vinda.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Vinda.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Looks like it's lifted from http://maharashtratimes.indiatimes.com/rssarticleshow/3159579.cms - same resolution. utcursch | talk 16:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Sultan Bahoo shrine2.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Sultan Bahoo shrine2.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sultan Bahoo shrine2.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Sultan Bahoo shrine2.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Sultan Bahoo shrine2.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Delete: this uploader claims PD on all his images but they come from different source and different authors/uploaders. An identical resolution image is sourced [http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.alfaqr.net/images/d_sultan-bahu-03.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.alfaqr.net/biography-hazrat-sultan-bahu.html&usg=__o5mY6XrPoE9IZ28g08tZCjigREs=&h=265&w=607&sz=111&hl=en&start=2&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=q4gyIM5ExEiSpM:&tbnh=59&tbnw=136&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522Sultan%2BBahu%2522%2Bshrine%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3Dxrs%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26tbs%3Disch:1 here] but there is no access to the image or page. ww2censor (talk) 16:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Sabir piya.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Sabir piya.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sabir piya.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Sabir piya.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Sabir piya.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Delete: this uploader claims PD on all his images but they come from different sources and different authors/uploaders. Cannot find a source for this low resolution web image. If the uploader took the image we would expect a better quality image. Besides which it is orphaned anyway. ww2censor (talk) 16:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Khatam ghousia.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Khatam ghousia.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Khatam ghousia.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Khatam ghousia.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Khatam ghousia.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Delete: based on the previous false claims of being his own work and falsely licencing images as public domain, all his commons images have been deleted after deletion nominations started here, many others are nominated here too. Where sourced his images are sourced from different websites and different authors/uploaders. Delete as WP:DUCK. ww2censor (talk) 16:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Sultan bahoo poetry2.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Sultan bahoo poetry2.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sultan bahoo poetry2.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Sultan bahoo poetry2.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Sultan bahoo poetry2.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Delete: based on the previous false claims of being his own work and falsely licencing images as public domain, all his commons images have been deleted after deletion nominations started here, many others are nominated here too. Where sourced his images are sourced from different websites and different authors/uploaders. Delete as WP:DUCK. ww2censor (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Sultan bahoo poetry.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Sultan bahoo poetry.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sultan bahoo poetry.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Sultan bahoo poetry.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Sultan bahoo poetry.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Delete: based on the previous false claims of being his own work and falsely licencing images as public domain, all his commons images have been deleted after deletion nominations started here, many others are nominated here too. Where sourced his images are sourced from different websites and different authors/uploaders. Delete as WP:DUCK. ww2censor (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Sultan Bahoo shrine4.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Sultan Bahoo shrine4.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Sultan Bahoo shrine4.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Sultan Bahoo shrine4.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Sultan Bahoo shrine4.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Delete: based on the previous false claims of being his own work and falsely licencing images as public domain, all his commons images have been deleted after deletion nominations started here, many others are nominated here too. Where sourced his images are sourced from different websites and different authors/uploaders. Delete as WP:DUCK. ww2censor (talk) 16:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Kerala-Dress-1.png}} ([{{fullurl:File:Kerala-Dress-1.png|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Kerala-Dress-1.png}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Kerala-Dress-1.png}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Kerala-Dress-1.png}}}}}} logs]).

• It seems highly unlikely to me that the uploader both painted and photographed both of these images. Powers ^T 16:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Najeeb Sultan Bahoo.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Najeeb Sultan Bahoo.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Najeeb Sultan Bahoo.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Najeeb Sultan Bahoo.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Najeeb Sultan Bahoo.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Delete: based on the previous false claims of being his own work and falsely licencing images as public domain, many others are nominated here too. Where sourced his images are sourced from different websites and different authors/uploaders. This image was moved to the commons and deleted there under the same problems as all his other images per :Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mola pak3.jpg ww2censor (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Molapak3.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Molapak3.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Molapak3.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Molapak3.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Molapak3.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• * Delete: {dulpicate of above image) based on the previous false claims of being his own work and falsely licencing images as public domain, many others are nominated here too. Where sourced his images are sourced from different websites and different authors/uploaders. This image was moved to the commons and deleted there under the same problems as all his other images per :Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mola pak3.jpg ww2censor (talk) 16:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|After Midnight}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Shivalogo.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:Shivalogo.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Shivalogo.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Shivalogo.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Shivalogo.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Eeekster (talk) 19:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Delete No one really knows what this is from.--Effingcrazy (talk) 06:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Effingcrazy

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Permission received. — ξ^xplicit 19:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Dr. Hedayat.JPG}} ([{{fullurl:File:Dr. Hedayat.JPG|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Dr. Hedayat.JPG}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Dr. Hedayat.JPG}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Dr. Hedayat.JPG}}}}}} logs]).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• :Note: This image was uploaded using my account, since User:Taghzieh [talk] was not yet autoconfirmed. It was uploaded from the computer of User:Taghzieh, who personally assured me that he had taken the picture himself, and that he was willing to release it under the GFDL and the CC-by-sa 3 licenses. It is, I believe, a good snapshot with fading effects applied via a photo editing program such as photoshop. He said that it had been taken when he visited the subject in Iran in 2006, for a conference if I understood correctly. I explained the copyright issues to him, and I have no reason to think he is lying about the matter. DES ^(talk) 22:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• :On further conversation, User:Taghzieh tells me, by telephone, that the initial photo was printed and physically cut and the resulting print re-scanned to produce this image. An OTRS email can be sent if needed. DES ^(talk) 23:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

::Please do send OTRS permission. That would be much appreciated. Thanks, FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

:::Permission recieved, I'll be tagging this and the other image. James (T|C) 01:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:ChrisRainbow.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:ChrisRainbow.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:ChrisRainbow.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:ChrisRainbow.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:ChrisRainbow.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Grain and lighting suggest that this is cropped from a magazine/newspaper of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Delete replaceable: person is still alive. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete: [http://www.theavenueonline.info/site1/bios/rainbow.htm this looks like the source] for the uploaded image and clearly appears to be a derivative work cropped from [http://kochiken.hp.infoseek.co.jp/simon/pages/chris_rainbow.htm his 1993 album cover] Looking over My Shoulder. ww2censor (talk) 12:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:FarnworthFamilyCrest.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:FarnworthFamilyCrest.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:FarnworthFamilyCrest.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:FarnworthFamilyCrest.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:FarnworthFamilyCrest.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Family crest of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Comment Given a blazon (the formal description of a coat of arms) there is very little flexibility in how a coat is drawn, quite possibly not enough for copyright to attach. This BTW is a coat of arms, or more technically a full achievement of arms, not a crest. That siad, drawing a coat and particularly the mantling in standard style (as is done here) requires some skill and practice, a random individual would not achieve this standard a look in many cases. DES ^(talk) 04:50, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note that there are now computer programs which will take as input a blazon and produce a standardized image of a coat of arms. DES ^(talk) 06:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:GattegnoBG.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:GattegnoBG.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:GattegnoBG.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:GattegnoBG.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:GattegnoBG.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

• Was used as a book cover in 1989 [http://www.amazon.com/Gattegno-Anthology/dp/0900095776] MilborneOne (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Image now tagged to show original in PD and licensing of derivation. Shell ^babelfish 08:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Charles Edward Addington Coat of Arms 1876-1953.png}} ([{{fullurl:File:Charles Edward Addington Coat of Arms 1876-1953.png|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Charles Edward Addington Coat of Arms 1876-1953.png}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Charles Edward Addington Coat of Arms 1876-1953.png}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Charles Edward Addington Coat of Arms 1876-1953.png}}}}}} logs]).

• Seal/coat of arms of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep label {{t1|pd-1923}}. Image is from 1876 and is beyond its copyright limits. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:46, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep per BQZip01. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

This illustration of the coat of arms of Charles_Edward_Addington_Coat_of_Arms_1876-1953.png was created by myself “Rachel Spencer-Ward” from the Addington family archives. I give full permission under the cc-by-sa licence for public use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachel Spencer-ward (talk • contribs) 15:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. Uploader indicates that they created the files from CoA descriptions. Since I was unable to find any images resembling these, that claim seems plausible. CoA descriptions are not copyrighted, though individual renderings would be; in this case it seems that the images can be licensed as the creator chooses. Shell ^babelfish 03:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Addington Coat of Arms.png}} ([{{fullurl:File:Addington Coat of Arms.png|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Addington Coat of Arms.png}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Addington Coat of Arms.png}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Addington Coat of Arms.png}}}}}} logs]).

• Seal/coat of arms of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep Fix copyright status (verify the date the CoA was made; it may be PD) and add FUR for its article. Please notify me prior to deletion and I will make the fixes if there are no further comments. — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

This illustration of the coat of arms of Addington Coat of Arms.png was created by myself “Rachel Spencer-Ward” from the Addington family archives. I give full permission under the cc-by-sa licence for public use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachel Spencer-ward (talk • contribs) 15:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

• Unable to find a date for this particular design though original designs date back to the 1700s. Left a note for BQZip about this and several others below to see if we can sort these out. Shell ^babelfish 08:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by {{admin|Fastily}} A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Addington Coat of Arms 1805.png}} ([{{fullurl:File:Addington Coat of Arms 1805.png|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Addington Coat of Arms 1805.png}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Addington Coat of Arms 1805.png}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Addington Coat of Arms 1805.png}}}}}} logs]).

• Seal/coat of arms of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• keep 1805=pd. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep per BQZip01. Clear example of {{tl|PD-old}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by {{admin|Fastily}} A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Anthony James Darren Charles Edward Piers Addington-Barker 1965.png}} ([{{fullurl:File:Anthony James Darren Charles Edward Piers Addington-Barker 1965.png|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Anthony James Darren Charles Edward Piers Addington-Barker 1965.png}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Anthony James Darren Charles Edward Piers Addington-Barker 1965.png}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Anthony James Darren Charles Edward Piers Addington-Barker 1965.png}}}}}} logs]).

• Seal/logo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep as a PD image 1965 publishing date={{t1|PD-Pre1978}} (the image does not have a copyright notice & it fails to comply with U.S. copyright law and lost its copyright years ago). — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

This illustration of the coat of arms of Anthony James Darren Charles Edward Piers Addington-Barker 1965.png was re-created by myself “Rachel Spencer-Ward” from the Addington family archives and I give full permission under the cc-by-sa licence for public use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachel Spencer-ward (talk • contribs) 15:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by {{admin|Fastily}} A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Eaton James Elliott Charles Addington-Barker 2005.png}} ([{{fullurl:File:Eaton James Elliott Charles Addington-Barker 2005.png|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Eaton James Elliott Charles Addington-Barker 2005.png}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Eaton James Elliott Charles Addington-Barker 2005.png}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Eaton James Elliott Charles Addington-Barker 2005.png}}}}}} logs]).

• Seal/logo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

This illustration of the coat of arms of Eaton James Elliott Charles Addington-Barker 2005.png was re-created by myself “Rachel Spencer-Ward” from the Addington family archives and I give full permission under the cc-by-sa licence for public use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachel Spencer-ward (talk • contribs) 15:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by {{admin|Fastily}} A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:Nicholas Edward Addison James Addington-Barker 2007.png}} ([{{fullurl:File:Nicholas Edward Addison James Addington-Barker 2007.png|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:Nicholas Edward Addison James Addington-Barker 2007.png}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:Nicholas Edward Addison James Addington-Barker 2007.png}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:Nicholas Edward Addison James Addington-Barker 2007.png}}}}}} logs]).

• Seal/logo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

This illustration of the coat of arms ofNicholas Edward Addison James Addington-Barker 2007.png was created by myself “Rachel Spencer-Ward” from the Addington family archives. I give full permission under the cc-by-sa licence for public use. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachel Spencer-ward (talk • contribs) 15:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:HUMCicon.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:HUMCicon.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:HUMCicon.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:HUMCicon.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:HUMCicon.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Logo of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:SHEHZADROY2.JPG}} ([{{fullurl:File:SHEHZADROY2.JPG|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:SHEHZADROY2.JPG}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:SHEHZADROY2.JPG}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:SHEHZADROY2.JPG}}}}}} logs]).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:SHEHZADROY.JPG}} ([{{fullurl:File:SHEHZADROY.JPG|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:SHEHZADROY.JPG}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:SHEHZADROY.JPG}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:SHEHZADROY.JPG}}}}}} logs]).

• Closeup of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:GM LR.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:GM LR.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:GM LR.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:GM LR.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:GM LR.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete: I know who this guy is, he builds schools in remote villages in Pakistan and you will enjoy reading his book Three Cups of Tea, but this identical but lower resolution image is attributed to the subject in [http://www.seacoastonline.com/articles/20091125-FOOD-911250343 this article] which looks distinctly like a better resolution black and white version of his image [https://www.ikat.org/about-cai/staff/ on this web page]. The organisation he runs might give permission if someone tried. [https://www.ikat.org/media-and-press/image-gallery/ Their image gallery's] copyright, which does not include this image, is unclear but appears to release images under an attribution licence. ww2censor (talk) 13:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
• Comment: This was deleted on Commons. It is a black and white version of a [https://www.ikat.org/wp-includes/images/gregphoto.jpg studio photo] from the subject's website. Jonathunder (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Kafziel}} AnomieBOT⚡ 22:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

::File:{{ucfirst:GM AFG.jpg}} ([{{fullurl:File:GM AFG.jpg|action=delete&wpReason={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15#File:GM AFG.jpg}}}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:{{ucfirst:GM AFG.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:File:{{ucfirst:GM AFG.jpg}}}}}} logs]).

• Questionable black and white photo. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:Delete: again attributed to Greg Mortenson [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/thebusinessofgiving/2010522416_greg_mortensons_path_of_peace.html?syndication=rss here], [http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=1126037&lang=eng_news here] and [http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2009/1204/p07s01-wome.html here - image 3]. In the same Christian Science Monitor article is [http://www.csmonitor.com/var/ezflow_site/storage/images/media/images/2009/1204/p07s01-wome.html/mmortenson_p1.jpg/7025624-1-eng-US/MMORTENSON_P1.jpg_full_600.jpg an image] attributed to a US Armed Service's member which might actually be PD. ww2censor (talk) 13:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.