Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 May 19

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and tag with {{tl|PD-Pre1978}}. — ξ^xplicit 03:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

::File:MBTA Old SystemMap.jpg ([{{fullurl:File:MBTA Old SystemMap.jpg|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2010+May+19%23File%3AMBTA+Old+SystemMap.jpg%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:MBTA Old SystemMap.jpg|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3AMBTA+Old+SystemMap.jpg}} logs]).

• Transit Map - Unlikley uploder is copyright holder of map ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. This was publicly displayed in the U.S. prior to 1978—and without a copyright notice. Thus, is in the public domain per {{tl|PD-Pre1978}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep under good faith. — ξ^xplicit 03:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

::File:Spotted leopard.jpg ([{{fullurl:File:Spotted leopard.jpg|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2010+May+19%23File%3ASpotted+leopard.jpg%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:Spotted leopard.jpg|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3ASpotted+leopard.jpg}} logs]).

• Pic looked too professional to have been taken by an average layperson. Uploader needs to prove that he took these pictures, beyond just standard template proofs. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 19:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. I think good faith should be assumed here. Metadata is present, and user does not have a history of suspicious uploads. I disagree that the picture looks "too professional". IronGargoyle (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: procedural keep. As the file is tagged as non-free, this isn't the venue to discuss this matter. Tagged as {{tl|di-replaceable fair use}} instead. — ξ^xplicit 03:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

::File:O2 wireless box II.jpg ([{{fullurl:File:O2 wireless box II.jpg|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2010+May+19%23File%3AO2+wireless+box+II.jpg%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:O2 wireless box II.jpg|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3AO2+wireless+box+II.jpg}} logs]).

• There's no earthly way I can see that this is a legitimate fair-use image. It's a relatively common product and still in production—there must be thousands of the things about which someone could take a photo of.  – iridescent 20:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 06:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

::File:Tea Party Protestors.JPG ([{{fullurl:File:Tea Party Protestors.JPG|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2010+May+19%23File%3ATea+Party+Protestors.JPG%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:Tea Party Protestors.JPG|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3ATea+Party+Protestors.JPG}} logs]).

• This image returns three TinEye [http://www.tineye.com/search/8da28a78dce68017508230e1a22112464f079793 search results]. Most notably, [http://imgur.com/Mb88e this website] has the exact same image, but at a much higher resolution. Doubtful that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ^xplicit 22:12, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.