Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 26

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; no reason given for deletion.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

::File:Phoenix's Roosevelt District area.JPG ([{{fullurl:File:Phoenix's Roosevelt District area.JPG|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2011+August+26%23File%3APhoenix%27s+Roosevelt+District+area.JPG%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:Phoenix's Roosevelt District area.JPG|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3APhoenix%27s+Roosevelt+District+area.JPG}} logs]).

• Kumioko (talk) 02:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
• Why? It's asserted to be self-made. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:19, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

::File:Perry Smith.jpg ([{{fullurl:File:Perry Smith.jpg|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2011+August+26%23File%3APerry+Smith.jpg%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:Perry Smith.jpg|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3APerry+Smith.jpg}} logs]).

• Impossible to verify now that Answers.com grabs all content from WP, but it is highly unlikely that this 1960 mugshot is licensed under the GFDL. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
• Question - Since this is a mugshot wouldn't that be a government license since it was taken by the police? --Kumioko (talk) 04:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
• The question is, which government license? The subject of the image was captured in Nevada, which as far as I know does not release works by the state government into the public domain (unlike the federal government and a couple other states). Neither does Kansas. If the mugshot was from a city/county police department, we have no idea of knowing the copyright license. However, this might fall under Template:PD-US-not renewed or Template:PD-US-no notice—but I don't know whether it's customary for police departments to not renew copyright on mugshots, or whether the original source of the mugshot contained a copyright notice, which is why I'm bringing it here for discussion. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 20:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

::File:WATER GAP BRIDGE AUG 14 1953.JPG ([{{fullurl:File:WATER GAP BRIDGE AUG 14 1953.JPG|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2011+August+26%23File%3AWATER+GAP+BRIDGE+AUG+14+1953.JPG%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:WATER GAP BRIDGE AUG 14 1953.JPG|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3AWATER+GAP+BRIDGE+AUG+14+1953.JPG}} logs]).

• No source, own work is doubtful Jay8g (talk) 04:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by {{admin|Moonriddengirl}} AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

::File:Badr-stamp-Suparco-Pakistan.JPG ([{{fullurl:File:Badr-stamp-Suparco-Pakistan.JPG|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2011+August+26%23File%3ABadr-stamp-Suparco-Pakistan.JPG%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:Badr-stamp-Suparco-Pakistan.JPG|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3ABadr-stamp-Suparco-Pakistan.JPG}} logs]).

• Not sure about the copyright status of Pakistani stamps, but someone would prob be able to supply us with the details here. If found to free, it should be moved to Commons. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 14:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

• Delete: modern stamps of Pakistan appear to be copyright for 50 years and while I don't know when this was issued it certainly is not that old. This has been discussed here and, I presume for that reason, there are only a few Pakistan images on the commons. ww2censor (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

::File:Avalon Lyndhurst.JPG ([{{fullurl:File:Avalon Lyndhurst.JPG|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2011+August+26%23File%3AAvalon+Lyndhurst.JPG%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:Avalon Lyndhurst.JPG|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3AAvalon+Lyndhurst.JPG}} logs]).

• This photo looks more like a promo photo to me, hence the low resolution. Could be a copyvio Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 14:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

::File:Rebate checks.jpg ([{{fullurl:File:Rebate checks.jpg|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2011+August+26%23File%3ARebate+checks.jpg%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:Rebate checks.jpg|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3ARebate+checks.jpg}} logs]).

• Unable to verify copyright status. Kelly ^hi! 21:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn, thanks guys, I didn't know what the source image was. –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

::File:Siciliainahat.gif ([{{fullurl:File:Siciliainahat.gif|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2011+August+26%23File%3ASiciliainahat.gif%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:Siciliainahat.gif|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3ASiciliainahat.gif}} logs]).

• Who took the original photograph? –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
• Scott Bauer, Image Number K8595-9. Source is http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/graphics/photos/oct99/k8595-9.htm and it's license is: {{tl|PD-USGov-USDA-ARS}}
• Giano was of course perfectly entitled to release a derivative with a PD licence. --RexxS (talk) 02:29, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

::*It is perfectly obvious that it's an edited version of this :File:Goat.jpg. Can some intelligent sould sort it for me, i am rather pre-occupied at the moment. Giacomo Returned 10:04, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

:::* I've added information linking to the original on both description pages. I trust this debate can be closed now? --RexxS (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

::File:AE CPos.jpg ([{{fullurl:File:AE CPos.jpg|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2011+August+26%23File%3AAE+CPos.jpg%5D%5D}} delete] | talk | [{{fullurl:File:AE CPos.jpg|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3AAE+CPos.jpg}} logs]).

• Claim of own work is highly questionable due to watermarking. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.