Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 14#Prochoice
=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 14|December 14]]=
==Judges==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was retarget
- {{no redirect|1 = Judges }} → :Book of Judges (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judges&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2017-11-14&end=2017-12-13&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Judges stats])
[ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Judges|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Judges closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Judges|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Judges closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Judges|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Judges closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
I doubt that the book is the primary topic of the term, which is the plural of the common noun, judge. I would retarget this to Judge (disambiguation). bd2412 T 22:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Retarget to Judge (disambiguation). I thought of Judge with {{tlx|R from plural}}, but that's now my second choice. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 22:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC); revised: 23:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- I went through exactly that thought process while deciding what exactly I wanted to propose. bd2412 T 02:36, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- I support the retarget proposal as well. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Retarget to Judge (disambiguation) as a more plausible target --Lenticel (talk) 01:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.