Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 24#3.14159265358979323846264338279

• {{no redirect|1 = Андрей Новаков }} → :bg:Андрей Новаков  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2017-02-22&end=2017-03-23&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9_%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Андрей Новаков|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Андрей Новаков closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Андрей Новаков|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Андрей Новаков closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Андрей Новаков|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Андрей Новаков closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

There is no more affinity for a soft redirect to this individual than any other individual within the Bulgarian Wikipedia. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 21:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

• I just found Andrey Novakov, which appears to be a local page for the individual who is described at :bg:Андрей Новаков. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 22:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Retarget to Andrey Novakov as an {{temp|R from native name}}. Soft redirects to non-English wikis are essentially never the best solution, at least in article space. Thryduulf (talk) 09:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
• Regarget as above. Si Trew (talk) 21:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
• Retarget per above but should be tagged with {{tl2|R from alternative language|bg}} instead. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Your mileage may vary }} → :wiktionary:your mileage may vary  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Your_mileage_may_vary&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2017-02-22&end=2017-03-23&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Your_mileage_may_vary stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Your mileage may vary|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Your mileage may vary closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Your mileage may vary|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Your mileage may vary closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Your mileage may vary|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Your mileage may vary closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Why does this page exist anymore? Google search for the phrase shows the Wikitionary's page first. If any purpose, it is confusing. Doesn't belong on Wikipedia. RoCo^(talk) 15:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

• Keep as it meets the criteria for wiktionary soft redirects at Template:wi: there's no relevant wikipedia page (excluding TV Tropes, but that doesn't seem redirect-worthy), there is a relevant wiktionary entry and users are searching for it on wikipedia (on average 5 hits a day). – Uanfala (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per Uanfala. Google is not the only way people search. Thryduulf (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Comment I previously nominated this article for deletion and the outcome was this redirect. Vectro (talk) 02:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
• Comment YMMV is also a {{tlx|wiktionary redirect}}, and the nominator User:Rollingcontributor or others may wish to add it to this nomination. (The expression to mean, if I may paraphrase, "You may not think the same as I", is not very WP:WORLDWIDE, and I guess there is some mileage in actually making an article about where this expression comes from, which is more than Wiktionary can do: I presume it was some required strapline for car adverts in the U.S. at some time, but it is very much an Americanism that is not understood well in the UK at least.) Si Trew (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = File:Logo PVV.png }} → :File:Partij voor de Vrijheid (logo).png  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Logo_PVV.png&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2017-02-07&end=2017-03-08&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=File%3ALogo_PVV.png stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:File:Logo PVV.png|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#File:Logo PVV.png closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:File:Logo PVV.png|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#File:Logo PVV.png closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:File:Logo PVV.png|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#File:Logo PVV.png closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Orphaned file redirect. File was moved over three years ago. The name is not a plausible search term for the target. Safiel (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

• Comment this has been getting regular hits all the way through last year very recently suggesting that either it's linked from somewhere externally or was only orphaned very recently. I don't think that this is an implausible search term for the logo of an organisation known as PVV. Thryduulf (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

:*Note The orphaning I believe occurred recently. I believe another user recently updated any links that pointed to this redirect. Safiel (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

:**{{Ping|Safiel}} You are correct, and here's the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Party_for_Freedom&diff=769433436&oldid=769432022 diff]. Steel1943 (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

• Create Commons:File:Logo PVV.png on Commons as a redirect to Commons:File:Name.jpg, then delete this redirect per {{Tl|Db-redircom}}. The acronym "PVV" is obviously ambiguous, and this is a method to fix the ambiguity issue. Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
• Keep - The instructions for moving a file state, "After moving the file, please replace all uses of the old file link with the new one.", hence all file redirects should be orphaned. The guidance concerning file redirects states, "As when a page is moved, a redirect is left when moving files. In most cases the file redirect should remain on the original page, except if the original name falls under one of the revision deletion criteria (purely disruptive, grossly insulting, privacy breaching, etc.) or shadows a file on Commons."; they shouldn't be suppressed unless they meet one of the criteria for speedy deletion. This means that there are many redirects in existence that are no different than this one (I create them regularly when renaming files), hence I see no reason to delete this one in particular. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 12:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Liberal bias }} → :Media bias in the United States  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberal_bias&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2017-02-22&end=2017-03-23&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Liberal_bias stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Liberal bias|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Liberal bias closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Liberal bias|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Liberal bias closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Liberal bias|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Liberal bias closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This term is not restricted to the United States (e.g. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10158679/BBC-has-deep-liberal-bias-executive-admits.html] [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/a-land-of-bias-from-sea-to-shining-sea/article4316890/]). - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

• Retarget to Media bias per nomination. Thryduulf (talk) 13:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - By itself, the term "liberal bias" is vague enough that it can also refer to academia ([https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-02-22/how-not-to-address-liberal-bias-in-academia see here]) and film production ([https://www.conservativebookclub.com/17001/featured-article/the-big-short-proves-hollywoods-big-liberal-bias see here]). CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - {{no redirect|conservative bias}} redirects to media bias. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 19:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

::Yup, so do {{-r|Progressive bias}}, {{-r|Conservative media}}, {{-r|Conservative media bias}} (and others that are basically synonymous with "media bias" so are OK by me.) There are a couple of others such as {{-r|Media-bias}} which are harmless (but annoying) clutter. {{-r|News coverage}} is a bit worrying, I am not sure that should go straight to media bias, will list separately. Si Trew (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = 3.14159265358979323846264338279 }} → :Pi  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3.14159265358979323846264338279&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2017-02-22&end=2017-03-23&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=3.14159265358979323846264338279 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:3.14159265358979323846264338279|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#3.14159265358979323846264338279 closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:3.14159265358979323846264338279|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#3.14159265358979323846264338279 closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:3.14159265358979323846264338279|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#3.14159265358979323846264338279 closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Overly long (and inaccurate) redirect to Pi. By this point, it might be worth blocking creation of all titles starting with "3.14159", because there's little to no reason for someone to search beyond the fifth decimal place if they're looking for pi.  ONR  (talk)  05:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. The length is not a problem at all, but the inaccuracy is. Thryduulf (talk) 13:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Comment Just so it's obvious where the inaccuracy is, the relevant digits of Pi are 3.141592653589793238462643383279. The 3 I have bolded is omitted in the nominated redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Delete WP:PRECISION. And special maths prizes to Tavix and User:Old Naval Rooftops! Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:PRECISION. Also, it is a really unnecessary redirect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kostas20142 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.