Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 16#Family game
=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 16|December 16]]=
==Colin Kroll==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was procedural close
- {{no redirect|1 = Colin Kroll }} → :HQ Trivia (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colin_Kroll&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2018-11-16&end=2018-12-15&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Colin_Kroll stats])
[ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Colin Kroll|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Colin Kroll closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Colin Kroll|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Colin Kroll closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Colin Kroll|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Colin Kroll closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
Delete this is a recent death. There is no reason to redirect this to "HQ Trivia" when he is the cofounder of Vine (service), a much more famous company. WP:REDLINK the article name pending a GNG-competent article. It should not redirect somewhere -- 67.70.34.69 (talk) 21:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep He's getting substantial coverage in RS. There's enough information for an article. Davey2116 (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment the current redirect was created by redirection of an article by an editor who said there wasn't sufficient notability to support an article. The current situation of the redirect pointing to HQ Trivia seems like a poor choice to me, so REDLINKing the article name until an article with sufficient sourcing is created would be the path forward -- 67.70.34.69 (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. There is more than enough material available from reliable sources to create an article. It should be referred to articles for creation. Capitalistroadster (talk) 22:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- If it is referred to AfC, the redirect will become a REDLINK and the article history would be moved to DRAFT: Colin Kroll, which would be fine by me, since it removes the poor redirect (but still shows up as a link to DRAFTspace with the non-existent page suggestion tool). I would suggest rolling back the draft to the stubby article that previously existed before the redirection overwrote it, if it moves to DRAFTspace -- 67.70.34.69 (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.